PaperBiro
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Messages
- 4,159
- Car(s)
- a Veloster
It loses marks for no explanation about the Smilers.Are they still there now? Are they still going to try and 'feed' the whale? Exactly what difference is there going to be other than the whale no longer being tortured?
You're right, it is a bit of an odd "unanswered question".
The Dr Who website says that the smilers are androids, designed to keep watch over the humans, and the winders are the humans who look after/repair them. The smiler-winders are half human, half android. They were set up to be the "bad guy" of the ep, but it turns out they weren't.
I kinda want to say I like the fact it wasn't entirely explained. Yes, it leaves us wondering a bit, but it would have avoided putting more exposition into what is (thanks to the 45 minute timeslot) already a fairly action-packed Dr Who episode every week.
again, fucking brilliant! According to the confidential Karen is 5'9", the perfect dreamgirl! I do wonder about what the ubernerds will say at Planet Gallifrey.
Doctor Who's regenerations were modelled on bad LSD trips, internal BBC memos have revealed.
The Doctor's transformations were meant to convey the "hell and dank horror" of the hallucinogenic drug, according to papers published on the BBC Archive. Regenerations were introduced in 1966 to allow writers to replace the lead actor. New Doctor Matt Smith is the 11th Time Lord. The papers also reveal the difficulties of bedding in a new Doctor. In an internal memo dating from 1966, producers outlined how the original Doctor, William Hartnell, would be transformed for his successor Patrick Troughton. It also tackled the "horrifying experience" of the regeneration.
"The metaphysical change... is a horrifying experience - an experience in which he relives some of the most unendurable moments of his long life, including the galactic war," it said. "It is as if he has had the LSD drug and instead of experiencing the kicks, he has the hell and dank horror which can be its effect," the memo added. Discussing his appearance, the document stated: "His hair is wild and his clothes look rather worse for wear (this is a legacy from the metaphysical change which took place in the Tardis)."
The documents also reveal how new Doctors have faced hostility from viewers. Some members of the audience felt Troughton "exaggerated the part".
"Once a brilliant but eccentric scientist, he now comes over as a half-witted clown," said one viewer.
Another told the BBC's Audience Research Department: "I'm not sure that I really like his portrayal - I feel the part is exaggerated - whimsical even - I keep expecting him to take a great watch out of his pocket and mutter about being late like Alice's White Rabbit."
His successor Jon Pertwee fared a little better in 1970, although a research report following his first appearance declared: "Reaction to this first episode of the new Dr Who series can hardly be described as enthusiastic." Tom Baker's debut also drew much criticism. "General opinion was that the new Doctor Who is a loony - he is an eccentric always, but the way it was presented made him stupid," said one viewer.
And in 1984, Colin Baker proved to be a turn-off, with one viewer finding him "too stern" and another "too aggressive". Reaction to Sylvester McCoy's debut in 1987 was even worse. His "approval rating" was considerably lower than Colin Baker's, although the reception given to his sidekick Mel, played by Bonnie Langford, was worse.
Roly Keating, the BBC's director for archive content, said: "The whole idea of regenerating the Doctor was a flash of genius that's kept Doctor Who fresh and exciting for 47 years now. "As we welcome Matt Smith and Karen Gillan into the Tardis, it's the perfect moment to remember his predecessors and also to celebrate the work of the BBC Archive in preserving these documents and photographs for future generations."
Also, for UK people of the right age : The Demon Headmaster!
Also - enough about the British army Daleks - SPACE SPITFIRES - HOW AWESOME IS THAT!?!
This is still my favorite version of the theme:I think I know my problem with the new theme is, the lack of bass.
vs.
- I really like the "cracks eradicating the old Who events" thing, it is a great way of explaining away the paradoxes between the old and new stories- very inventive!
- I also agree that the use of the "moment" should be what caused the Doctor to regenerate, perhaps because the "moment" required so much life force/energy that when combined with the pain of all the people you love and the world you know dying that he basically had to regenerate to try and give himself a new "force"?
- I've also had a little thought that the "moment" sent everything in the Time War into the void. I don't really know why, but it just seems like the Doctor in the series 2 finale was very knowledgable (more than usual) and emotional about it.
Sorry I can't give you more detail, I'm not very good with creative writing :lol: But it is really good though, I think you've done a really good job of writing a really believable (within Who canon) but unique (i.e. not like the crap fan-fiction that every man and their tin dog can write) proposal! I agree with you though, GB can be quite freaky at times, and too serious and not able to deal with people who show any emotion apart from negativity/an excessive level of excitement about Doctor Who (and nothing else in life). Hence I've stopped posting in most sections except the merch and periodicals areas. They tend to be tamer.
And I take it that the final tale "sequel" (for want of a better term) is pretty good! I'm thinking of buying it online, is it really worth it for a big new-who fan?