Let me explain it differently what I'm on about.
Over here cyclists going on the road either have a marked lane on the right side like pictured below, or ride on the right edge of the rightmost lane. You as a car turning right are in the middle of the rightmost lane, so you will cross the (marked or virtual) bike lane to your right. You cross his lane, so you need to yield even if he is behind you.
It's similar to if you were to turn right from the second lane to the right, and there was a car coming behind you on the right lane. You also need to yield to that, even if it is not next to you.
https://pic.armedcats.net/n/na/narf/2010/10/01/427px-Radfahrstreifen.jpg
And this is bad desing for sure. I explain:
Cars have blind spots, particularly on the rear right (or left, if you drive along on the left). To partly cope with this, when you are turning right you need to be on the rightmost lane (you are not allowed to turn right directly from the second lane if the first one allows to proceed straight on), indicate, check for pedestrian, turn. If a cyclist (or someone else, for what matters) pass you on the right at this moment (no bike lanes), then it's not your fault.
Similarly, when you need to move from one lane to the next one on the right, you indicate, check and wait for room, then move. The incoming cars on the right have right of way, but can not simply speed up and pass, they have an obligation to help you complete your movement safely; this means that if they are behind you they should slow down. Again, not everyone does this, but it is a car, it is registered and identifiable, and you are not necessarily at fault (even if this is most likely so if you have no witnesses). Also, a car is bigger, more visible, and has strong lights.
To sum up: a car is bigger, more visible, traceable, should help you when you move, is not allowed to overtake on the right (city streets) and you can physically leave not enough space for a car to pass you on the right, if you so choose.
Bycicles (no, it's bicycle. They even manage to mess up my english, grrr...), on the other hand, CAN overtake you on the right, you can rarely leave no room for them to pass, they can skip on the "help another road user" rule, they have no law punishing them for not behaving safely, they are not well visible, they are small and noiseless, they have no great brakes and/but they can go quite fast.
So, if you are in slow moving traffic (about the same speed as a bicycle), you might well not know if there is a cyclist on your right, who, on his/her part, can and will ignore your indicators and pass you on the right "'cause I'm on a bike lane". A solution to this, a solution I myself adopted in Germany, for example, is when I wanted to turn right I indicated, I check, I move ONTO the bike lane, then turne right. But there is a problem more. If the bike lane is on the kerb, you can not get onto it with your car, but you will still experience all the problems of cyclists speeding around in your blind spot because "I'm on a bike lane". Even worse: they are on the kerb, so they (I say "they", but it's really a bad design issue, I would do exactly the same, automatically) think even less of what they are doing and cross roads at high speed, directly in car's blind spot.
Clearly, since you are the bad, polluting, aggressive, heavy, evil car, you are at fault in every one of these situations.
Other examples of bad design?
Here it is:
http://tinyurl.com/32dnbpk
the small street is merging into the bigger one, passing directly on the bike lane. Bicycles pass on both direction and since there are arches, before you can actually see something you need to put all the front part of the car ON the bike lane. Yet, if something happen, it's YOUR fault.
Oh, and bicycles are expressly allowed to undertake on the right when cars are waiting at an intersection.
This is no problem, as long as they are not allowed to do so when the light is green and the cars are moving. Turning right when the light goes green and you have a crowded bike lane on your right can rapidly turn into a frustrating, endless series of cyclists yelling at you because they have the right to pass even if you were in front of them before, if you are indicating and if you struggle to see them approaching. I know cyclists are the same people who drive cars, but this situation could make even their blood boil if they were in the car rather than on the bike.
All of this not mentioning bicycles' behaviour in pedestrian areas.
The incredibly annoying thing, however, is that it is incredibly difficult to explain all of these issues to someone who is more of a cyclist than a car driver. They simply won't understand. They will say: "the law says I'm doing right, so you pay attention and don't bother me".