Feds opening investigation into Florida teen killing

Wow, when did the politics section get excluded and why?
It has been that way for years. Keeping it simple; We have never run the full post count recalculation after all the upgrades+patches+post&thread deletions, so your visible post counts are some wild-ass guess.
The post/thread/user numbers you see are wrong, and we have never cared enough to take the forum down for hours/days/weeks to recalculate them.. but if everyone feels the need to have actual post numbers, make a poll. I did a recount on my posts, and came up with 5272..

99,9 % in my case. I do post once in a while in the episode threads. So that's why my reputation plummeted from 2000 to 160 a couple of months ago. :p
That was because we changed how rep power was calculated back in November.
 
What would be interesting would be a comparison on murder rate against income and education achievement independent of race.
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0695.pdf
Whites have at least twice the numbers in each group of low income that blacks.
Numbers below are families X 1000

..............................Whites.....Blacks
Below $10,000......... 2,698......1,062
$10,000 to $14,999....1,947.......620
$15,000 to $19,999....2,365.......687
$20,000 to $24,999....3,029.......667
$25,000 to $29,999....3,067.......666
$30,000 to $34,999....3,050.......581
$35,000 to $39,999....3,154.......545

Pretty poor correlation between poverty by race and violent crime, wouldn't you agree?

Educational achievement,high school graduate or more:
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0229.pdf

Year-----White----Black
2000-----84.9-----78.5
2005-----85.8-----81.1
2007-----86.2-----82.3
2008-----87.1-----83.0
2009-----87.1-----84.1
2010-----87.6-----84.2

Based on these numbers, you might expect that white violent crime would be two or three times that of blacks, but the inverse is true.
 
Last edited:
At the same time ignoring race completely out of fear of appearing racist doesn't make one more knowledgeable either. ((((snip)))) But they never hesitate to pull the race car against caucasians. It's just more politically correct.
Police are also a victim of this mentality.
When I was in my early teens and twenties, I never had a problem with getting pulled over when I borrow ed my fathers car. He drove Mercedes Benzs and Audis, and he'd occasionally have me pick something up when I visited. I have seen interviews conducted with black celebrities who complain that they are pulled over more often because they are black and in a nice car.
Is it fair that innocent people get pulled over? Absolutely not. I think it sucks. Do young black men steal more cars than young white men? Yes.
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/JAR_Display.asp?ID=qa05269
qa05269.png

Cops are low paid folks charged with finding (among other things) car thieves. Why would a policeman pull over an inner city youth with a Mercedes? Because there is a likelyhood that it's not legally his Mercedes. Why didn't they pull me over in the same setting? It was far more likely that I was in the vehicle legally.
It's a common sense approach that works.
Let me ask you, what do you think the race is of this car owner?
Kool-Aid%2BArt%2BCar%5B2%5D.jpg

Does it make you racist?

- - - Updated - - -

I wouldn't be surprised if many of you are too young to remember how Jesse Jackson was castigated for saying, "There is nothing more painful to me ... than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
 
I am suggesting that, victim or not, anyone who spends time on the internet telling people that blacks are more prone to violence than whites instead of spending this time thinking about the conditions people live in is a lazy person who thinks that by classifying himself as a victim he somehow acquired a right to be racist.
Your case is even more problematic as it seems like you joined solely in order to post in this thread - at least it's where all your posts (apart from one mediocre Romney joke) can be found.

Every time I was assaulted (OK, the single time it happened) it was by Polish people. Do I think that it was because they were Poles and I am German? Or because the Poles still hate us because of 1939? The thought did not even cross my mind.
A couple of points;
1. I statistically demonstrated that the Zimmerman case is not the norm. There is quite a bit of (justifiable!) outrage about what happened to young Martin, but it's not acceptable to point out that a small percentage of a population is responsible for an disproportionate amount of violent crime. Simply pointing this fact out elicits outrage, and censorious calls of racism.

2. I didn't classify myself as a victim of crime, the law of the United States and the law of the state of Louisiana classified me as a victim. I wasn't simply robbed, I was gratuitously beaten as well. There's no profit in that, the beating was incidental to the robbery.

3. My case is problematic? What "case"? Are the statistics i quote less valid because I have a low post count? Is a crime less onerous if the victim is middle class? My "case" is based on uncontested statistics.

4. Acquired a right to be racist? Nice straw man. It's fine to disagree, but miscategorizing what I said is not honest. I wrote "I wasn't racist when I moved to Louisiana, and I don't think I am now. I am wary of black males in their teens and twenties, particularly in poorly lit areas. " Frankly, that's common sense.

5. I don't know if statistically, Polish people commit vastly more violent crime than other groups in your area, but here in the US, if a stranger attacks you, chances are, it's likely to be a black male. Nearly 30 percent of the largest U.S. cities had black homicide arrests rates that were more than 10 times higher than white rates. On a side note, I bet Poles were wary of young men speaking German back in 1939. Jews too. But there's no reason for them to be upset now. Just as I am not responsible for the racism of a generation ago. Still got my ass whipped, though.
 
Last edited:
trayvon.jpg

Statistically, guys named Zimmerman are not a threat to young black men.
Young black men are a threat to young black men.
 
Which leads to an interesting point:
Why is the violent crime rate higher amongst young black men?
Well, it's not melanin. The blackness of a young black man doesn't make him criminal.
There's nothing in a black mans genetics that make some of them violent.
It's something that is a choice. It's cultural.
As long as it is racist to point out that there is a group of a given cultural identity that commits vastly more crime, then nothing will get fixed.

The ugly truth is that among crappy people, some poor and in "Ghettos", a level of criminality is accepted. I look at the news, and you see a grieving mother talk about how "good" her son was, and later you find that the young teen had a bulging rap sheet, filled with burglary and violent crime. These people are not just "middle class" people with no money, they have an entirely different mindset. Some of these people are black.
Chalmet Loisianna was poor, and densely packed, but not filled with crime. The people held to middle-class values, and made sure their kids did their homework. They disciplined their kids, and held them to a higher standard than kids (both white and black, but overwhelmingly black) in the 9th ward. Chalmet happened to be white.
The groups were culturally as different as chalk and cheese, but they were separated by a small bridge and a race. The real difference was the parenting that the children received.
 
Last edited:
OK, what exactly are you trying to proof by spamming this thread?
 
OK, what exactly are you trying to proof by spamming this thread?
How am I spamming?
You might not agree with me, but I've been polite, and supported what I have written with statistics.
You've called me a racist and a spammer? If you have to have to launch ad hominem attacks, and can't address my substantive posts, you have a pretty weak argument.
Support or retract. Don't lash out and act nasty if you can't support your point.
 
Which leads to an interesting point:
Why is the violent crime rate higher amongst young black men?
Well, it's not melanin. The blackness of a young black man doesn't make him criminal.
There's nothing in a black mans genetics that make some of them violent.
It's something that is a choice. It's cultural.

See....you asked the right questions, but your answer could not be more wrong. The reason blacks (generalizing here a bit) are in the situation they are is directly a result of hundreds of years of oppression from the government and racism from the majority white population. End of story.

I think expecting a few decades of freedom to make up for centuries of discrimination is asking too much. \

What makes people turn to crime is poverty, lack of opportunity (in the work force and education), and a bunch of other factors that have nothing to do with race. The same factors apply to whites or hispanics that turn to crime as well.
 
A couple of points;
1. I statistically demonstrated that the Zimmerman case is not the norm. There is quite a bit of (justifiable!) outrage about what happened to young Martin, but it's not acceptable to point out that a small percentage of a population is responsible for an disproportionate amount of violent crime. Simply pointing this fact out elicits outrage, and censorious calls of racism.
Not only is a smal percentage of a population responsible for a large percentage of the crime, it's a small percentage of that small percentage.

See what I did there? :)

How am I spamming?
You might not agree with me, but I've been polite, and supported what I have written with statistics.
You've called me a racist and a spammer? If you have to have to launch ad hominem attacks, and can't address my substantive posts, you have a pretty weak argument.
Support or retract. Don't lash out and act nasty if you can't support your point.
By reposting new posts every time you want to post something new. If no one's posted since the last time you posted, it's customary to press the "edit" button and ammend said previous post to one's satisfaction. :p

Common mistake with beginners, and I suppose that's what he's referring to.

Apart from that, welcome to the forum. :)
 
See....you asked the right questions, but your answer could not be more wrong. The reason blacks (generalizing here a bit) are in the situation they are is directly a result of hundreds of years of oppression from the government and racism from the majority white population. End of story.

I think expecting a few decades of freedom to make up for centuries of discrimination is asking too much. \

What makes people turn to crime is poverty, lack of opportunity (in the work force and education), and a bunch of other factors that have nothing to do with race. The same factors apply to whites or hispanics that turn to crime as well.
I agree with your last paragraph, largely. But:
There is a cultural difference between the poor of New Orleans circa 1980s and the Vietnamese community of the deep south. The Vietnamese have gone from being absolutely poor to middle class in one generation. They were discriminated against, hated by a lot of people in our community, and arrived poor.
The more ignorant people claim that they were able to do this with government subsidies, because they have a hell of a time reconciling their own lack of success with what the immigrant community was able to do in only a few decades. This group has succeeded and in fact thrived where others have only failed and made excuses, a community with a lower violent crime rate than either the black or white people of the same economic demographic.
That's due to their culture, not their skin color.

NOMIX:
"Not only is a smal percentage of a population responsible for a large percentage of the crime, it's a small percentage of that small percentage.

See what I did there? "
A small group of a group that is self organizing culturally? Would you agree that there is a small subgroup of people that are outside of the societal norms of either blacks or whites that will have children at an astronomically greater risk of criminal behavior? Would you agree that these people exist in every culture (lets stop talking about race for a moment) as outsiders? That the Japanese are not Yakuza, That the Russian are not all mobsters, that poor whites aren't all neo Nazi Skins?
But that those groups exist, and are self organizing?
 
Last edited:
I think immigrants in general have found success in many countries and flourished. In most cases, surpassing the lower income classes of those respective countries. That includes immigrants from African countries as well. Perhaps it has to do with the whole premise behind immigration....searching for better opportunities. Perhaps that is what is lacking among the local population....

I see you are making an effort to distinguish between culture and race, but at the same time your arguments conflate the two.

We also can't ignore white collar crime, which i'm sure are overwhelmingly committed by whites (in the United States).
 
TLDR:I long windedly agree with Firecat almost completely.
I think immigrants in general have found success in many countries and flourished. In most cases, surpassing the lower income classes of those respective countries. That includes immigrants from African countries as well. Perhaps it has to do with the whole premise behind immigration....searching for better opportunities. Perhaps that is what is lacking among the local population....

I see you are making an effort to distinguish between culture and race, but at the same time your arguments conflate the two.

We also can't ignore white collar crime, which i'm sure are overwhelmingly committed by whites (in the United States).

Immigrants often represent the most internally motivated group of any people. The Vietnamese boat people took huge risks and fought long odds to come here and capitalist system favors people with those characteristics. They represent a self selected group, who have a common ethnic and geographical origin.

These people leave others behind.
The people of the 9th ward were those types of people. Whites and Black middle class moved to the suburbs in what was called white flight, leaving behind those who couldn't, or wouldn't. Crime rose for the reasons you mentioned.

The people who could leave were people with assets. The homeowners left, the shop owners moved their shops, and the tax base disappears. Schools go to hell, policing goes to hell, streetlights that go out aren't replaced because there's no money to pay for services. The next group of people fled the higher crime rate, and so on. You pump out the successful, and concentrate the least successful.

"I see you are making an effort to distinguish between culture and race, but at the same time your arguments conflate the two. "
This is the point I am getting to. The statistics I quoted were ABSOLUTELY TRUE. But they tell you absolutely nothing practical. They measure something easy to measure, which is a simple head count of violent criminals.

But the race of the offenders have NOTHING to do with the "criminality" of black people. Because black people are just like white people, in every way that is important.

Black men work to get the raise, the woman, and the wristwatch I want. They work within the system to get what they want, and are getting more successful as entrenched racism becomes less acceptable. They will have to work harder, because racism will never totally go away, but the vast majority will find success, and drive their children to be successful.

Black people are not inherently more criminal than whites. But black people have a core group of unsuccessful inner city residents that live in a setting that siphons away its role models and success stories.

Whats left behind? A culture of failure, populated by all races, but disproportionally represented by oppressed, some mentally ill, some unmotivated. Because few people that had a choice, the money,or the gifts stayed.
What became acceptable behavior changed. It's understood that young people in these circumstances will commit more petty crime, and being arrested for those crimes doesn't carry the stigma it does amongst the middle class. Succeeding in school is seen as acting "white". Inner city women don't take birth control at the same rate as middle class women, which leads to high out of wedlock births, and a staggering abortion rate. There are poor whites and black that will have nothing to do with these people, and that's why Chalmet didn't have the problems that 9th ward had. But there were plenty of black Chalmets.
This is why I don't consider myself racist. I'm not afraid of the black guy that runs the local branch of my bank. I'm not afraid of my black co-workers. I wasn't afraid of the two black girls that took pity on my nerd ass and dated me in college after I left the service, because those people share my goals and beliefs, and are like me in most ways except with a greater chance of lactose intolerance and Sickle Cell Anemia.
 
Last edited:
Now we know, then, how do you suggest we fix it?
 
Now we know, then, how do you suggest we fix it?
I wasted a lot of words to say the following: a handful of underachievers, with poor expectations, are giving a lot of people a black eye.
White people have a far wore problem with this than black people do. Blacks have a reason for their problems, they largely came to this country as property, in chains. What have whites been up to in the last fifty or so "enlightened" years?

3293889224_27bdc45e07.jpg

WTF?
127097.jpg

Oh for Christ's sake. Seriously?

NeoNazis.jpg

Oh. For. F*&ks. sake.

Weli, white people aren't exactly batting a thousand, are they? But do you know what one of the best things you can do about violent, thuggish people, besides getting away from them?
Laugh at them. Don't glorify it, don't excuse it, don't ignore it. Make fun of it.
Want to know who one of my heroes are?
Stetson Kennedy.
"Author and folklorist Stetson Kennedy, who infiltrated the Ku Klux Klan six decades ago and exposed its secrets to authorities and the public but was also criticized for possibly exaggerating his exploits, died Saturday. He was 94.

Kennedy died at Baptist Medical Center South, near St. Augustine, where he had been receiving hospice care.

In the 1940s, Kennedy used the "Superman" radio show to expose and ridicule the Klan's rituals. In the 1950s he wrote "I Rode with the Ku Klux Klan," which was later renamed "The Klan Unmasked," and "The Jim Crow Guide."


This guy gutted Klan membership. He helped make them a laughingstock. Don't glorify thuggery by anyone of any race.

That's the negative tool. What positives are "doable" for the chronically poor?
Stop funding schools and police locally, fund them federally. Teach effective birth control, and make it free. Regulate payday loans. Allow records of non violent crimes to be expunged after five to ten years of good faith so that people who screwed up can get a job. Shame people who don't pay their child support, whatever their race. Stop investing thousands in useless car mods (Huge rims, general carbage, extreme ricing) and spend your money on something more responsible, or get laughed at.

And one last thing. White people can't take the high ground here, they have too great a track record of screwing up, see above photos. So middle class black might have to take an even greater role in culturally re-norming those blacks who act ghetto.

Just like it's my responsibility to call skinheads tw@ts.
What do you think?
 
Last edited:
Yes, there has been cases of right wing nut cases who want to exterminate other races. There was also a war where a couple of million people died to stop that.
 
Yes, there has been cases of right wing nut cases who want to exterminate other races. There was also a war where a couple of million people died to stop that.
I was referencing (in order of appearance in photos) the Klan, Skinheads, and neo-nazis. I'm not suggesting that we name and shame actual Nazis, as they are largely dead, and as Dr Grip pointed out, they did their horrific acts in "1939"
Am i the only one who thinks that one of those neonazis looks a heck of a lot like Tom Arnold?
 
Last edited:
Well, when it comes to groups like that their criminal activity is largely (solely) motivated by racial prejudice. Which I think you already alluded to in your previous post. I won't comment on which is worse. Gang violence in inner cities committed by minority groups (hispanics or blacks for instance) is just as abhorrent to me.
 
Well, when it comes to groups like that their criminal activity is largely (solely) motivated by racial prejudice. Which I think you already alluded to in your previous post. I won't comment on which is worse. Gang violence in inner cities committed by minority groups (hispanics or blacks for instance) is just as abhorrent to me.
Wow Firecat, that's a great point, which honestly had not occurred to me, but it seems obvious now.
That's something I would love to know more about, or even hear any conjecture on your guys part. I can't begin to guess the motivation of white racists. I can understand perhaps, being afraid of a group identity, which is what I have inarticulately tried to describe here. Just as I'm not afraid of bald guys, but throw in a pair of red suspenders and Doc Martens, and I do a head count and look for easy exits, which I tried to justify here.
White Power has to be a learned behavior. Like a blind adherence to a sports team, a religion, or a political group, that is trained from infancy. Gangs on the other hand are probably a survival mechanism, a way of narrowing down who whips your butt, and a support system in an unforgiving and hostile environment.

I have described being afraid of a sector of inner city black youth, what Firecat has perhaps identified as gang culture. I think that that is appropriate adaptive behavior. I don't worry that these people will come out to my house and burn a cross in my yard. I do believe that there is a racism in gang culture, but it's the kind that seems to be based on the resentment borne of daily frustrations.

I know I got my job for a lot of reasons that had nothing to do with my qualifications, and being white was one of them. ALL whites benefit from this, so I understand why blacks might feel resentful toward ALL whites. I always get the benefit of the doubt, even when there is NO statistical justification. All young black males on the other hand, (Treyvon) are held responsible for the actions of the minority of a minority.

I've never organized my feeling about this, or examined what I believe. Sorry about the thread hijack, but I think I understand the larger worldview better now.
 
Last edited:
Top