Filters (Circ-Pol + ND)

burnsy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
748
Location
Indiana, USA
Car(s)
2011 Ford F150 Platinum
Nope, it'll just be a bit of a pain, because you'll have to readjust it after every shot.

And it's not something you can fix by getting another filter. All polarizers are direction-dependent, as you can probably tell from this tutorial :)

thankyou guys. i guess i can handle that. it'll be good to use when going to the ALMS race this weekend at Mid-Ohio. use the CPL for taking shots of the cars stationary, then the uv and maybe the CPL for on track shots.
 
Last edited:

napoleondyna

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
914
Location
Tucson, AZ
Car(s)
1966 MBZ 250SE (W108), 1987 BMW 535i (e28)
I just bought a hoya 52 MM CPL on ebay literally 2 hours ago. Am i really going to have to adjust it for every shot? That kinda sucks and yes my lens turns when focusing (damn nikon). Dont get me wrong nikon is great it just kinda sucks that i have to re-adjust. Also, if you dont have it rotated correctly will it just look normal? If its close will you get some effect?
 

MXM

I paid for this title
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
5,630
Location
Finland
Yes, you will get *some* effect, just maybe not the one you want.
Look at the example photos in first post. By rotating you gradually adjust from one photo to the other.

If you want to get rid of reflections on a car, by rotating you're basicly chosing a plane in which light will be polarized and reflections removed. So in horisontal position side windows will be transparent, and in vertical windshield. Roughly anyway.

I'm not sure how nikon's 18-55 rotates, maybe just by holding CPL's adjustment ring you can keep it in one position while focusing? Not too tight, so you don't damage the focusing mechanism or something :)
 

mautzel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
2,603
Location
Frankfurt/M, Deutschland
Car(s)
Octavia Combi Mk II
That's his problem, pretty much guaranteed. The 75-300 is f/5.6 at the long end, and sticking a CP on the end further restricts the light getting to the AF system.


But that shouldn's cause such serious effects at 300mm if I'm not mistaken:

That's the best I was able to focus with the filter in both manual way and AF:
http://img72.imageshack.**/img72/3164/dsc4987ox1.jpg

That's the same pic with the filter removed:
http://img252.imageshack.**/img252/540/dsc4988xa4.jpg

Both pictures taken at 11.15am in full sunlight.
 

mautzel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
2,603
Location
Frankfurt/M, Deutschland
Car(s)
Octavia Combi Mk II
The smaller the focal lenghth is, the better I'm able to focus properly with the filter put on, but I feel that there's still a noticeable difference.

Same pics at 70mm:
with filter:
http://img526.imageshack.**/img526/7669/dsc4986ff2.jpg

without filter
http://img186.imageshack.**/img186/6630/dsc4989zi2.jpg
 

Shadowness

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
1,111
Location
Midlands, UK
Car(s)
Caged Clio 182 Track Car
That's bizzare! Like I said before, CPLs should have no effect on focusing. I use one on my 100-300mm and it has no effect on auto focus.
What brand is your filter?, I can only think that it's, sorry to say, a bit naff!
 

Paddy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
2,317
Location
Waterford, ?ire
Car(s)
'06 BMW 320 M Sport
I had a simliar problem before, around this time last year ...


'When I use a Circular Polarizer on my 70-200 2.8 the pictures become wildly unusable and very much so out of focus. When the polarizer is removed the pictures become clear again. I've included two examples. The filter is a Tama Pro C-POL


With Circ Pol
wcpol.jpg


Without Circ Pol

wocpol.jpg


Moral of the story, don't skim on essential products. Ordered a new Hoya one last night (I know, a year later :D)
 

mautzel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
2,603
Location
Frankfurt/M, Deutschland
Car(s)
Octavia Combi Mk II
I guess that's the solution for me as well - my filter's a no name filter that I got "surprisingly" cheap off ebay. So everybody thinking about getting one of these - let the pictures above be a warning to you!
 

MXM

I paid for this title
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
5,630
Location
Finland
Ok, something I want to add here... I got a Hoya HMC CPL a week ago, and it blocks ALOT of light. How much f-stops are you supposed to lose? I just tried 2 shots in shutter priority with same exposure, and without filter I get f/4.5 and with filter f/8 (varies depending on the polarization plane). But 4-6 steps always. Is it supposed to be that bad?

Edit: I've seen mentioned on internet that 1.4 to 3 f-stops are lost. But are my camera's steps equal to f-stops?
 
Last edited:

.cmd

Active Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
146
Location
Sydney, Australia
Sorry for what is most likely a very stupid question, but what difference does the size (55mm, 67mm, etc.) of a CPL make? Does it change what size lens they can be used on?
 

Shadowness

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
1,111
Location
Midlands, UK
Car(s)
Caged Clio 182 Track Car
Sorry for what is most likely a very stupid question, but what difference does the size (55mm, 67mm, etc.) of a CPL make? Does it change what size lens they can be used on?

The different sizes are purely for lens with different thread sizes. So my 100-300mm Sigma lens has a 82mm thread size, and my 12-24mm Nikon has 77mm. So you could buy a seperate size filter for each lens OR alternatively, you could buy the 82mm filter and a 82mm to 77mm step down ring, which would allow you to use the 82mm filter on the 77mm thread (so you would have 1 filter for both lenses).
I would advise that you only use a larger filter on a smaller lens thread, and NOT a small filter on a larger thread, as you would see the filter in the shot.

Apart from that, the size would make no difference, each filter size should perform equally.
 

IceBone

Blue Wheel Hipster
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
27,216
Location
Slovenistan
Car(s)
Audi A5 Quattro
I bought a Cokin c-pol 55mm for about 32 euro and i have no problems focusing, pics just tend to turn out a bit blurry at lower light, because exposure time needs to be longer.

the only thing is that the "band" of reflection removal is quite narrow

here in your pic the entire glare on whe windscreen is removed:

EDC_1778copy.jpg


but with mine it would be just a part of it. Is it because it's more expensive and better or am i doing something wrong?
 

Shadowness

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
1,111
Location
Midlands, UK
Car(s)
Caged Clio 182 Track Car
Icebone: It may just be because you havent set it up quite right, and it might need a tiny bit more rotation to get the whole windscreen clear.
When you say its a bit blurry, what shutter speeds are you using?

Practice setting up the filter on stationary cars, as you will have more time to 'play about' as opposed to a moving car.

Posting an example pic may help :)
 

IceBone

Blue Wheel Hipster
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
27,216
Location
Slovenistan
Car(s)
Audi A5 Quattro
looking... wait for edit

EDIT:

cpol_example.jpg


and about the blurriness, i shoot on Apperture priority, so the exposure sometimes falls quite a bit bellow 60, because the filter lets less light through.
 
Last edited:

STi Nut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
988
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Car(s)
2008 Toyota Yaris 1.3L 5 Door Auto
Hey guys,

I am in the market for a CPL filter for my Nikon 18-135mm lens, i believe that it needs a 67mm Filter but being new to this whole thing i don't know what to look out for, such as brands.... i don't want to go into the store in the city since every time i go in there they are dicks and try and sell me either the most expensive thing or what ever they want to get rid of..... so i need your help guys :D

Thanks,
 
Top