Forum-wide survey: How oomphy is your ride?

When can we expect to see funny pictures in this thread?
 
1994 BMW 850: 386hp (287kW) at 5.379 litres and 1955kg makes it:
53.5 kW/l and 147 kW/t V12 N/A

1992 Donkervoort S8AT: 210hp (156kW) at 1.993 litres and 675kg makes it:
78.3 kW/l and 231 kW/t i4 Turbo
 
1994 BMW 850: 386hp (287kW) at 5.379 litres and 1955kg makes it:
53.5 kW/l and 147 kW/t V12 N/A

1992 Donkervoort S8AT: 210hp (156kW) at 1.993 litres and 675kg makes it:
78.3 kW/l and 231 kW/t i4 Turbo

What about the Caddy :p
 
1984 Toyota Tercel: 1,500cc engine making 52.20kW and moving 997 kg
1990 Mitsubishi Pickup: 2,400cc engine making 108kW and moving 1220 kg.

This is fun :D
 
Last edited:
What about the Caddy :p
Well, manufacturer numbers...

1968 Cadillac Coup? DeVille Convertible: 375hp (280kW) at 7.73 litres and 2100kg makes it:
36,2 kW/l and 133 kW/t V8 N/A
 
1967 Ford Fairlane 500, I estimate (using dyno2000) around 320 crank HP, and and 340 crank ftlb.

There's probably about 20% drivetrain loss, so that works out to ~250 wheel horsepower and ~275 ftlbs from a 306 CI V8. Those numbers feel accurate according to the seat of my pants, but I won't know for sure till I get it on a dyno, hopefully later this year.

In your funky SI units, that's 186.4 kW, 372.8 Nm, and 5.02 litres

The car weighs approximatly 3000 lbs/1360 kg


The 1984 Chevrolet K5 Blazer is factory rated at 160 net HP, unknown torque, from a 305 CI V8, and weighs in at 4409 lbs, so 119.3 kW, 4.998 liter, and 2000 kg


The 1990 Saab 900 SPG is factory rated at 175 Hp, 195 lbft, from a 122 Ci Turbo I4, and weighs 2900 lbs, so 130.5 kW, 264.4 Nm, 2.0 liter, and 1315.4 kg
 
2014 Mustang GT: 420bhp (308kW) at 5.0 litres and 1750kg makes it:
61.6kW/l and 176kW/t V8 N/A

1989 Jeep Cherokee: 177bhp (131kW) (lol yeah right) at 4.0 litres and 1460kg makes it:
32.75kW/l and 89kW/t I6 N/A
 
Last edited:
The car weighs only 1360kgs? That's not a lot for a us 60s v8 monster.

You'd be surprised - a big car in that day just meant a bit more sheet metal. No safety or sound deadening or whatnot made for relatively light cars. Small-block V8s aren't crazy-heavy either.
 
Last edited:
You wish!

I didn't see the Blizzard, think you posted as I was writing mine. :lol:

Does it have an intercooler or just a turbo? Also with the 'optimising' and bigger intercooler mine should really produce at least 115hp. :|
 
I didn't see the Blizzard, think you posted as I was writing mine. :lol:
Does it have an intercooler or just a turbo? Also with the 'optimising' and bigger intercooler mine should really produce at least 115hp.

No intercooler as far as I know.

If you thought this post said something different, you're wrong and I definitely didn't misread Matt's question.
 
Last edited:
These are the two I use the most.

2014 Ford F150: 3.5L Twin turbo V6: 365hp(272kW), 2540KG

2012 Yamaha Super Tenere: 1199cc parallel twin: 108.5hp(80.9kW), 265KG

I'll let the spreadsheet to the maths.
 
2007 subaru legacy gt
H4T (turbo flat-4), 2.5l, 280hp.
1600 kg according to Wikipedia.
 
1993 Volvo 240GL Wagon. HP:116hp. Torque: 185nm. Engine: 2.3l N/A I4. Weight: 1393kg

1989 Ford Escort MK4 1.4 Ghia Convertible. HP: 72hp. Torque: 108nm. Engine: 1.4l N/A I4. Weight: 925kg
 
I added another column for a bit more e-penis contestery. N?rburgring lap time (as done by you, not someone else in an identical car that you've found on youtube). :p
 
I'm actually surprised my "Sportscar" the little Escort, is not the least powerful XD
 
Top