jetsetter
Forum Addict
Nicolas Sarkozy has joined attacks on Czech President V?clav Klaus for refusing to fly the European Union flag from Prague Castle.
The French President has lined up with the Euro-MPs who used a private visit to the Czech head of state's residence, on Dec 5, to upbraid Mr Klaus for not toeing the EU line.
"It was a wound, it was an outrage to see that flags had been taken down from public buildings," said President Sarkozy, speaking in Strasbourg.
Mr Sarkozy went on to criticise President Klaus for having the nerve to fight back, in his own home, against the EU politically correct police in the form of a brigade of hectoring MEPs from fatuously titled "Conference of Presidents".
"The presidents of the political groups, should not be treated in this way, neither should the President of the Parliament, neither should the symbols of Europe," he threatened.
Can it really be right for Mr Sarkozy, or anoyone else, to start telling the Czech head of state what flag to fly from his official residence in Prague Castle?
Should the Queen be flying one from Buckingham Palace?
The Czech President could not believe his ears, see here, when Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Franco-German Green leader and Hans-Gert P?ttering, European Parliament President, pitched up to criticise him for not flying the EU flag and for talking to Irish No campaigners.
"I don't care about your opinions," said Mr Cohn Bendit.
Neither, it appears, does Mr Sarkozy.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/bruno_...ce_tells_czechs_to_know_their_place_in_the_eu
I thought that, after ten years in the European Parliament, nothing could shock me any more. I was wrong.
I blogged last week about the abominable way in which the leaders of the various EP political groups traduced and insulted the President of the Czech Republic, V?clav Klaus. Brian Crowley, the Fianna F?il leader, ticked him off for talking to the leader of the "No" campaign, Declan Ganley. The Irish, he said, were in favour of the European Constitution Lisbon Treaty. How could he say this? Because his father had spent all his life fighting the British (quite an achievement when the old man was born 13 years after independence).
This was as nothing, though, compared to Danny Cohn-Bendit, the egregious soixante-huitard, who plonked a European flag in front of the President, declared "I am not interested in your opinions," and then proceeded to hector him in an unforgivable tone about the need for closer integration. A stunned Mr Klaus was left muttering that no one had spoken to him in such a tone since the days of Communist Czechoslovakia.
At the opening of this morning's session, I invited the acting Speaker to declare, in the light of these exchanges, that the European Parliament valued all democratic points of view, including those opposed to the Lisbon Treaty, and that it respected the office of the presidency of the Czech Republic. He declined to do so.
A few minutes later, Nigel Farage, the UKIP leader, rose to make a similar point. He reminded the Speaker, Hans-Gert P?ttering, that, when 14 MEPs were fined for demanding a referendum in the chamber, the stated reason was that they had misbehaved in the presence of a national leader: Jos? S?crates of Portugal. Yet when Cohn-Bendit and others behaved with outrageous boorishness to another national leader, Hans-Gert not only ostentatiously declined to restrain them, but joined in, upbraiding the Czech leader for daring to mention Communist Czechoslovakia (the complete transcript is available at the splendid EU Referendum blog).
As Nigel sat down, the irritating little socialist leader Martin Schulz, who recently complained that supporters of a referendum resembled Nazis, leapt to his feet. It was scandalous, he said, that the transcript had been published. Such meetings were traditionally secret. In disclosing what had been said, the Czech Republic had not behaved like a democracy.
Got that? To put into practice the EU's much-invoked commitment to democracy is undemocratic! You see how these people think.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/daniel...u_leaders_attack_transparency_as_undemocratic
Disturbing.