G35 Twin Turbo setup

Renesis

Lazier than Viper
Joined
Nov 27, 2003
Messages
9,680
Location
Quebec, Canada
Car(s)
2007 BMW Z4 3.0 SI
For the G35 fans out there (if there are some)

Img_1053.jpg

Img_1290.jpg


402WHP/357TQ at only 6.4PSI

http://www.ssr-engineering.com/products_g35twinturbo.php
 

SiR_dude

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
3,639
Location
Somewhere in rural Ontario, Canada
Car(s)
2000 Civic SiR
Not much of a G35 fan myself, but those are impressive numbers. On the other hand, I like the looks of the 350Z way better. I'm not sure - are the engines similar? That sort of power in a 350Z would kick ass!!
 

justin syder

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
4,096
Location
New York, USA
Car(s)
1986 Mercedes-Benz 300E
350Z looks pretty good but i mistook it for porshes a few times, which is a compliment. the look is a bit similar in the rear and the slop of the roof. but im sure its not as good to drive or performance and that stupid bar in the back is just plain dumb. id take the G35 over the 350Z.
 

xkwilson

Active Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
261
Location
Singapore
350Z Hardcore fan here!!! Well...the engine is the same in the G35 and the 350Z. But Nissan Japan has tuned it differently for both cars. They have so many levels of tune in Japan its hard to know which is which.
 

Renesis

Lazier than Viper
Joined
Nov 27, 2003
Messages
9,680
Location
Quebec, Canada
Car(s)
2007 BMW Z4 3.0 SI
I'd rather have a G35C than a Z but I'm not a fan of either.. interiors suck and none of them look that good to me.

I'd get rotors instead :wink:
 

zyran

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
618
Location
Malaysia
I agree with CanadianLoonie.

I don't really like the Z either ( no offense to Z fans, this is just my opinion ).

The lights are sharp, the shape of the roof is akward, it looks fat, and its engine should be producing more power. 3.5litres and only about 280(?) hp? I'm not sure though.
 

SiR_dude

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
3,639
Location
Somewhere in rural Ontario, Canada
Car(s)
2000 Civic SiR
....like I said, that sort of power in the Zed would be cool. I like the looks (the rear end is a bit iffy), but I must admit I've never taken a good look at the interior.
 

bone

"bangle for president"
Joined
Jan 14, 2004
Messages
16,827
Location
belgium!!
Car(s)
Volvo V40 & Yamaha Banshee
japanees cars only can have 280bhp!

and i agree with the fact that some people might think the Z isn't beatifull, but i realy can't understand the fact that some peeps call the G35 beautifull. it's one of the most ugly cars in japan imo
 

kteO1

Active Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2003
Messages
197
even at the time there were japanese cars that produced more than 280 bhp.example:nissan skyline gt r-32 r-33 r-33 r-34..and by the way zyran maybe the 350z from a 3.5produces only280bhp but also the 911 doesnt produce from its3.6 such a great horsepower....
 

Gleason

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2004
Messages
10
zyran said:
I agree with CanadianLoonie.

I don't really like the Z either ( no offense to Z fans, this is just my opinion ).

The lights are sharp, the shape of the roof is akward, it looks fat, and its engine should be producing more power. 3.5litres and only about 280(?) hp? I'm not sure though.

ONLY 280hp from 3.5l N/A'd isnt bad at all...Some people like engines that arent 'strung out' [read : s2000 ]........Talk to the v8 boys, chevys 350 = 5.7liters ONLY making 340-350bhp.....

If the 350z were a turbo'd 3.5liter then it would be another story, but N/Ad 280hp from a 3.5liter isnt bad at all, and this way it retains a good powerband throught....
 

Gleason

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2004
Messages
10
CanadianLoonie said:
Nissan 350Z = Porsche 911 look-a-like-wannabe

so...........Good looks, and cheaper.....not to mention it rapes the boxter around top gears track...

1:31.8=350z
1:37.0=boxter
 
Top