Gotta appreciate good humor. :)

[zeroSignal]

Saw this on my way back from uni today. Loved it!

 

[jasonchiu]

lol :lol: maybe its in the boot and back seat

 

[Stokvis]

The pic's gone.

 

[andyhui01]

its still there for me, its hosted by this site http://tb.polygonized.com , check if you can visit it

 

[chaos386]

Maybe he has two packs of gum in the glovebox? :lol:

 

[Kip_6666]

Oh thats great, who ever did that deserves a pat on the back.

 

[AutoMX]

im sure you could make one that small, a guy did make a 1/5 scale running ferrari model, and the engine ran sweet.

reminds me of the isetta powered by a hyabusa
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4538580232&indexURL=1#ebayphotohosting

 

[Cruzz563]

How small would something like that be...2, 3 litres?

That would be cool tho, a 3.0 litre V12

 

[MXM]

Smart is 3cyl 0.8l, so V12 would be 4 such engines... That makes 2.8l

EDIT: Correction, of course 12*0.8 is not a 2.8, it's 9.6l

 

[asthenia]

Ferrari 250's (incl. the GTO) had 3L V12's. 250 = cc per cylinder.

 

[Dark_Templer_102]

that would be a flying death machine

 

[freerider]

The problem is that a lot of people do it, to make wannabe-carlovers think they have a fast car (espacially with bmw m-cars).
Here's a rs6-wannabe:


Greetz Johan

 

[Stokvis]

Smart is 3cyl 0.8l, so V12 would be 4 such engines... That makes 2.8l

EDIT: Correction, of course 12*0.8 is not a 2.8, it's 9.6l

actually you shoudl be doing 4*0.8=3.2 you were kinda right the first time

 

[MXM]

Damnit. First time I did 4*0.7 (don't know why 0.7). Second time 12*0.8 (don't know why 12). Of course you're right, it's 3.2

 

[vanMould]

How about this one?
http://www.rotax.com/NR/rdonlyres/DE471CB4-8F32-40FE-87E7-D1A5B134CBBD/0/Thumbnails.jpg
It's a 436.7cc Rotax twostroker with 92hp.
436*6=2616cc.

Also: 92*6=552hp