prizrak
Forum Addict
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2007
- Messages
- 21,574
- Location
- No, sleep, till, BROOKLYN
- Car(s)
- 11 Xterra Pro-4x, 12 'stang GT
narf's perfect society:
narf's perfect society:
With cars, I don't have a problem with laws that require automobile manufacturers to provide seatbelts but I don't think that on the individual level we should be forced to use them. Basically, I think you should be free to make bad decisions with your own life.
That decision affects others. Although I wouldn't really mind if seatbelts were an optional extra or an aftermarket add-on; after all, bikes don't come with helmets from the factory....and yet you think I shouldn't be free to make the bad decision of producing or buying a new car without seat belts?
That decision affects others. Although I wouldn't really mind if seatbelts were an optional extra or an aftermarket add-on; after all, bikes don't come with helmets from the factory.
...and yet you think I shouldn't be free to make the bad decision of producing or buying a new car without seat belts?
As an individual, why wouldn't you wanna use a seatbelt in the first place?
*bald eagle screech*
Not sure - I always use mine.As an individual, why wouldn't you wanna use a seatbelt in the first place?
I'd bet you a Br?nnchen Currywurst the sound in your head isn't actually a Bald Eagle
Car smashes through railings into Tube underpass before driver flees
And none of that is really relevant because there is still no law that requires me to wear eye and ear protection - the key here is the difference between laws and the rules of a private club.
That is derailing the line of thought. You just call them different things because they apply to different geographical areas. But they are the same thing when you are inside the club; you must follow them or being thrown out.
The point stays: so many people understand so little of what they are doing that other people are setting limits to them to avoid them getting hurt. You can't choose if you don't understand the consequences of you actions.
That said, I repeat: rules should protect, not impose. If a rule forces people rather than protecting them... that rule is not ok.
100% wrong - it has NOTHING to do with geography. You seem to fundamentally not understand the difference between public and private actions.That is derailing the line of thought. You just call them different things because they apply to different geographical areas. But they are the same thing when you are inside the club; you must follow them or being thrown out.
Who the fuck are these "other people" and why the fuck do they think they know what's best for me??!?!?!?!The point stays: so many people understand so little of what they are doing that other people are setting limits to them to avoid them getting hurt. You can't choose if you don't understand the consequences of you actions.
No one forces you to use a car neither.You missing the point, a private club's rules only apple to members of that club, which you cannot be forced into.
You missing the point, a private club's rules only apple to members of that club. If I don't like wearing ear protection I'll go to a range that doesn't require it
Who the fuck are these "other people" and why the fuck do they think they know what's best for me??!?!?!?!