^ Umm, so they can actually charge the batteries, or even charge the batteries....? As "supplying power directly to the electric motors" is also charging the batteries. In other words, the turbines are not in any way, shape, or form used for thrust...
I don't recall saying otherwise. I merely quoted the only article then available. My point is 'Narf' should not be questioning me. If he has a problem, talk to the good men and women at EVO. It has nothing to do with me.
I am not part of the equation.
You're the one bringing up thrust vectoring, I simply question it.
Yes, we already established that was a joke.
I didn't say that they did. I said EVO did. I provided
the source to prove it. So you're argument is with EVO, not me.
You are the one posting that figure.
I think this is the underlying problem. You seem to be under the impression that I am arguing something that am not. I posted a quote from EVO, nothing more, nothing less. I then pointed out that if the information was not correct then you should confront EVO, not me. I am not arguing with you that the real figure is 968 horsepower. I only quoted that when it was the only source available.
Let's make sure we understand one another.
I am not arguing anything. I posted quotes from 2 sources. Jaguar and EVO. If EVO is wrong about the bhp. Then EVO is wrong, I am not saying that its 968, I said that EVO said it as 968. This was before the car was unveiled. If jaguar say Berlin is 900km from london, then Jaguar is wrong. I never said it was, they did. I merely cut and pasted the quote. That does not make me wrong. I can't be wrong because I have not set out a view. I haven't done anything other than post a quote. I am not arguing that it is 968 BHP. I am simply stating that yor poblem is with EVO not me..
If evo got mixed up, that is their fault, not mine. BUT if they did, it was probably down to jaguar's misleading press release, which clearly states that the turbines can either recharge the battery or provide power directly to the electric motors, as in the quote I just gave to you.
I'm not quite sure how you keep getting so lost. I haven't said anything that was my own work or my own opinion, I quoted the only source available at the time. I made no personal comment or observation. If you have a problem with the information, take that problem up with the source.
I believe the idiom is 'Don't shoot the messenger'.
London to Berlin is 900km?
Interesting.
Again, not my words. I'm not sure why you are arguing with someone who is not giving his own view. I didn't say that London to Berlin was 900km, I quoted Jaguar. Again, you are arguing with me about what others have said.
?????
I love the fact that this is annoying you so much that you will go to the trouble of giving more and more quotes with obviously false information.
More and more? I have quoted 2 articles by my count. The EVO article, which I quoted when it was the only source available, and also the jaguar press release.
Now, just in case we have still got crossed wires:
I am NOT arguing that it has 968bhp. I repeat
I am NOT arguing that. I am simply saying that if you have a problem with the information I quoted from EVO from
BEFORE the car was unveiled, then that problem is not related to me. You are arguing with something completely unrelated to me.
Edit: When you resort to neg-repping all my posts, you must know that you have comprehensively lost the argument.