Jeremy Clarkson given green light to appear on BBC shows

ahpadt

Forum Addict
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
9,895
Location
London
http://www.theguardian.com/media/20...ppear-on-bbc-shows?CMP=twt_a-media_b-gdnmedia

The BBC?s governing body has given Jeremy Clarkson the green light to appear on future BBC shows after it rejected a long-running complaint about the former Top Gear presenter being lined up to host BBC1?s Have I Got News for You.

The BBC Trust also rejected a complaint that called for information about what action had been taken against staff who witnessed Clarkson?s bust-up with Top Gear producer Oisin Tymon but did not intervene.

The trust?s complaints and appeals board, the final port of call for complaints escalated through the BBC system, has been assessing a call for Clarkson to be banned from appearing on all future BBC programmes following the fracas that cost him his job on the motoring show.

The complainant said director general Tony Hall?s comment at the time Clarkson was dropped ? ?there cannot be one rule for one and one rule for another dictated by either rank, or public relations and commercial considerations? ? had not applied to Clarkson given that he had been lined up to appear as guest host of Have I Got News for You.

The BBC said the issue of Clarkson has been ?considered at the highest level? and that while his contract had not been renewed on Top Gear, he was ?not banned from appearing on the BBC altogether?.

Clarkson ultimately decided against hosting Have I Got News for You during its last series because of the furore, but did appear in October.

The complainant escalated the issue through the appeals process at the trust, arguing that ?if the BBC allows the employment of someone who has assaulted another member of staff then the policy should be reviewed?.

The trust?s complaints and appeals board delivered a final verdict that said it would not uphold the complaint.

The trust said the choice of presenters was an editorial and operational decision which was the responsibility of the BBC executive board.

?The [complaints] panel did not consider that it was appropriate, proportionate or cost-effective to take this matter on appeal because it did not have a reasonable prospect of success,? said the BBC Trust.

The trust?s panel also declined to review a BBC decision not to pursue a complaint about staff members who stood by and watched the fracas between Clarkson and Tymon.

The BBC?s position was that it would not investigate the complaint as the matters raised were of an ?internal nature? and therefore could not be discussed.

The complainant?s comments had been ?passed to the appropriate figures within the BBC,? said BBC audience services which first handled the complaint.

The complaint was eventually escalated to the trust?s panel, stating that any inquiry into the action of other BBC staff present at the time of the incident, and any subsequent action, would be an ?operational matter? for the BBC executive board.

The trust panel said the complainant was entitled to make a Freedom of Information Act request for that information.

?The panel agreed that audience services had provided a reasoned and reasonable response to the complainant?s concerns,? said the trust.

More war documentaries please.
 
Last edited:
I think the point is that as he is no longer a BBC employee but is now essentially freelance (as he always remained to a certain extent previously) there are no barriers to him appearing on the BBC as a guest or in programmes produced by third party production companies such as Hat Trick (HIGNFY) or by W Chump and Sons for the purposes of future war documentaries.

BBC content isn't produced exclusively in house and hasn't been for a long time. It's no different broadcasting a show produced outside that features Clarkson than it is buying in a show from the US for instance.
 
Top