otispunkmeyer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2006
- Messages
- 4,829
- Location
- Loughborough UK
- Car(s)
- '03 Skoda Superb (farewell :(), '06 Honda Civic ES
So got a little road trip planned and will be visiting all the places listed in the title.
I have an NEX-6 and plan on travelling fairly lightly so I don't want to be hauling lenses.
I have the 16-50 Power Zoom, the 55-210 and the 35mm F1.8.
Of those, I'll definitely be taking the 35. Its a great lens and a no brainer for night time stuff thanks to the wide aperture (not worried about shutter speed per se, but image noise, not that impressed with the NEX in that regard). I don't think I'll take the telephoto zoom because its a bit duff really, slow and not sharp, and I am also unsure about the 16-50 PZ. It is average at best really and has small apertures which may limit its use at night. Plus the powerzoom bit is just down right annoying.
So I am planning on hiring something better.
I quite fancy the new Carl Ziess Touit 12mm (will also probably replace my 35 with the 32mm Touit later), but it is of course a prime and at 12mm, very wide, so I may find it to be of limited use. It should be great for landscapes though.
Another option (if its available) is the new Sony-Carl Ziess 16-70mm F/4 E-mount. Sony lens, but CZ optics. This at least gives a half decently wide aperture across a good zoom range. I dare say it could easily be the only lens I need to take. I have used a 24-70 before and found it really lovely for 90% of things. It should be a great walk around option however, will 16mm be wide enough for those expansive landscapes I am going see in Yosemite and Death Valley?
What do you guys reckon? I presume there will be some here with experience of shooting these locations and will have a better idea of what works and what doesn't?
Cheers
I have an NEX-6 and plan on travelling fairly lightly so I don't want to be hauling lenses.
I have the 16-50 Power Zoom, the 55-210 and the 35mm F1.8.
Of those, I'll definitely be taking the 35. Its a great lens and a no brainer for night time stuff thanks to the wide aperture (not worried about shutter speed per se, but image noise, not that impressed with the NEX in that regard). I don't think I'll take the telephoto zoom because its a bit duff really, slow and not sharp, and I am also unsure about the 16-50 PZ. It is average at best really and has small apertures which may limit its use at night. Plus the powerzoom bit is just down right annoying.
So I am planning on hiring something better.
I quite fancy the new Carl Ziess Touit 12mm (will also probably replace my 35 with the 32mm Touit later), but it is of course a prime and at 12mm, very wide, so I may find it to be of limited use. It should be great for landscapes though.
Another option (if its available) is the new Sony-Carl Ziess 16-70mm F/4 E-mount. Sony lens, but CZ optics. This at least gives a half decently wide aperture across a good zoom range. I dare say it could easily be the only lens I need to take. I have used a 24-70 before and found it really lovely for 90% of things. It should be a great walk around option however, will 16mm be wide enough for those expansive landscapes I am going see in Yosemite and Death Valley?
What do you guys reckon? I presume there will be some here with experience of shooting these locations and will have a better idea of what works and what doesn't?
Cheers