Let's have a laugh

LeVeL

Forum Addict
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
12,495
GRtak;n3554079 said:
Where is the defense of their freedom of speech being infringed?
I'm not in favor of this whatsoever :dunno: A bunch of snowflakes see something that isn't there and throw a tantrum and now the state is taking down political signs on private property? It's complete BS. Hopefully there's a lawsuit coming. I'm curious as to what the charges would be if they arrested the homeowner - probably the catch-all "disturbing the peace", which is used whenever a cop knows you're not breaking any laws but wants to teach you a lesson anyways.
 

LeVeL

Forum Addict
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
12,495
Did you not read your own link or are you just playing dumb?
 

NecroJoe

Forum Addict
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
19,219
Location
San Francisco area, CA, USA
Car(s)
2015 Mazda 3 S GT, 2015 VW e-Golf
LeVeL;n3554087 said:
Did you not read your own link or are you just playing dumb?
I don't think he meant to post that link. He tried to embed the image, and then the link ,title and caption hitched a ride.
 

GRtak

Forum Addict
Joined
Sep 6, 2008
Messages
18,342
Location
Michigan USA
I did mean to post the link so everyone could have a chance to see it.


LeVeL;n3554087 said:
Did you not read your own link or are you just playing dumb?

I did read the article. I even re-read the article just to make sure. But you said "snowflakes gonna snowflake". Does that refer to the people that made the sign, or the people that complained about it?

You call almost everyone that doesn't follow your narrow logic a snowflake at sometime or another, so it gets confusing.
 

prizrak

Forum Addict
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
19,980
Location
No, sleep, till, BROOKLYN
Car(s)
11 Xterra Pro-4x, 12 'stang GT
GRtak;n3554090 said:
I did mean to post the link so everyone could have a chance to see it.





I did read the article. I even re-read the article just to make sure. But you said "snowflakes gonna snowflake". Does that refer to the people that made the sign, or the people that complained about it?

You call almost everyone that doesn't follow your narrow logic a snowflake at sometime or another, so it gets confusing.
He made it pretty clear that whoever complained is the snowflake in his previous post.
 

NecroJoe

Forum Addict
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
19,219
Location
San Francisco area, CA, USA
Car(s)
2015 Mazda 3 S GT, 2015 VW e-Golf
prizrak;n3554091 said:
He made it pretty clear that whoever complained is the snowflake in his previous post.
Did he though? :? I'm with GR on this one. :lol: The post before his has two characters. The person who made the poster, and the reaction to the poster. Who's the apparently obvious snowflake?
 
Last edited:

prizrak

Forum Addict
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
19,980
Location
No, sleep, till, BROOKLYN
Car(s)
11 Xterra Pro-4x, 12 'stang GT
NecroJoe;n3554093 said:
Did he though? :? I'm with GR on this one. :lol: The post before his has two characters. The person who made the poster, and the reaction to the poster. Who's the apparently obvious snowflake?
LeVeL;n3554084 said:
I'm not in favor of this whatsoever :dunno: A bunch of snowflakes see something that isn't there and throw a tantrum and now the state is taking down political signs on private property? It's complete BS. Hopefully there's a lawsuit coming. I'm curious as to what the charges would be if they arrested the homeowner - probably the catch-all "disturbing the peace", which is used whenever a cop knows you're not breaking any laws but wants to teach you a lesson anyways.
:shrug: seems relatively straight forward to me...
 

TC

aka TomCat
Joined
Dec 11, 2005
Messages
11,417
Probably just confirmation bias in action. We all have our assumptions.
 

NecroJoe

Forum Addict
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
19,219
Location
San Francisco area, CA, USA
Car(s)
2015 Mazda 3 S GT, 2015 VW e-Golf
Oh, okay. I somehow scrolled right past that post. I saw the ones before it, and the ones after it, but somehow missed that one. Apologies! Thanks for providing the clarity!
 

prizrak

Forum Addict
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
19,980
Location
No, sleep, till, BROOKLYN
Car(s)
11 Xterra Pro-4x, 12 'stang GT
NecroJoe;n3554097 said:
Oh, okay. I somehow scrolled right past that post. I saw the ones before it, and the ones after it, but somehow missed that one. Apologies! Thanks for providing the clarity!
No worries also your anti-italian post completely makes up for it lol
 

Black Z Eddie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
1,229
Location
San Jacinto, CA
Car(s)
'06 350Z
NecroJoe;n3553958 said:
Don't blame the him. He'd probably want that person to be in the women's room. Sounds like you'd prefer this scenario:
[IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/media\/CekjiSHUEAEnJW6.jpg"}[/IMG2]
Yeah, because someone with mental disorder (the cross dresser. I had to clarify because no doubt you'd get confused) taking a piss inside the restroom is the same as some dude taking a selfie outside of a restroom. Totally the same thing...not. The sad thing is, this is typical Lib Logic.



[IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","height":"960","width":"960","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/uFl10mh.jpg"}[/IMG2]
 

NecroJoe

Forum Addict
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
19,219
Location
San Francisco area, CA, USA
Car(s)
2015 Mazda 3 S GT, 2015 VW e-Golf
Black Z Eddie;n3554107 said:
Yeah, because someone with mental disorder (the cross dresser. I had to clarify because no doubt you'd get confused) taking a piss inside the restroom is the same as some dude taking a selfie outside of a restroom. Totally the same thing...not. The sad thing is, this is typical Lib Logic.
]
okay, well, two things... This is a woman, and this photo just happens to be the one I picked at random, out of many including many inside a woman's restroom.

my point is that people being upset about a man using a men's room, also want to be upset about a woman using a woman's room who looks like this, is like cheering Kanye on for his MAGA hat, and then telling Taylor Swift to stay in her Lane in regards to politics... You can't have it both ways. People got to piss. Typical repub logic, I guess?
 

NecroJoe

Forum Addict
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
19,219
Location
San Francisco area, CA, USA
Car(s)
2015 Mazda 3 S GT, 2015 VW e-Golf
Black Z Eddie;n3554107 said:
Yeah, because someone with mental disorder (the cross dresser. I had to clarify because no doubt you'd get confused) taking a piss inside the restroom is the same as some dude taking a selfie outside of a restroom. Totally the same thing...not. The sad thing is, this is typical Lib Logic.
]
okay, well, two things... This is a woman, and this photo just happens to be the one I picked at random, out of many including many inside a woman's restroom.



my point is that people being upset about a man using a men's room, also want to be upset about a woman using a woman's room who looks like this, is like cheering Kanye on for his MAGA hat, and then telling Taylor Swift to stay in her Lane in regards to politics... You can't have it both ways. People got to piss. Typical repub logic, I guess?
 
Top