That will be 80-150k, sir. Courtesy of additional dealer markup.I'd rather have a GT350R.
Ford takes lessons from Ferrari on buying the GT.
Fuck you Ford, fuck you.
Really? You're mad at the process required to buy a 450k car?Ford takes lessons from Ferrari on buying the GT.
Fuck you Ford, fuck you.
That will be 80-150k, sir. Courtesy of additional dealer markup.
So would I, but I wouldn't pay a red cent of ADM. Or even Canadian MSRP (which is worse, in that I cannot avoid it).Like I said, I'd rather have a GT350R.
So would I, but I wouldn't pay a red cent of ADM. Or even Canadian MSRP (which is worse, in that I cannot avoid it).
With a price of $450,000 and only 500 getting made, it's already so far from an "everyman's sports car" that I just can't get all that worked up over it. While I'm not keen on the social media aspect, I kinda like the idea of "we don't want to sell these to someone who's looking at it like some sort of investment, either hidden away in a barn somewhere or flipped on ebay. We want the owner to actually drive it and show it off."
I'm not disagreeing with you one bit, only that even if I'm being treated well, I won't pay markup.You can't put a price on not being treated like a trained monkey though. I'd rather buy used and do what I want with my property.
With a price of $450,000 and only 500 getting made, it's already so far from an "everyman's sports car" that I just can't get all that worked up over it. While I'm not keen on the social media aspect, I kinda like the idea of "we don't want to sell these to someone who's looking at it like some sort of investment, either hidden away in a barn somewhere or flipped on ebay. We want the owner to actually drive it and show it off."
Really? You're mad at the process required to buy a 450k car?
That's like me being pissed that Scarlett Johansen has a list of requirements before she'll have sex. None of us have a shot anyway, so who cares?
FTFY.Of course buying a $450,000 car and having sex with a starlet are the same thing... The only thing I ever hear you say about buying a Ford is how Canadians get bent over,... oh wait. Maybe they do have more in common than I thought.
I get that I am not an intended customer because I simply don't have the cash to buy one. But what if I hit the lottery and wanted my first big toy to be this car? Oops, sorry, no history of owning Ford products that meet the requirements. Strike two for lack of social media activity. Strike three for not being able to produce a fancy video.
Over time, cars tend to become better in almost every way, except when they don't. The 2017 Ford GT will assuredly outdo its predecessor in terms of performance, in part due to packing at least 50 more horsepower, but it doesn't do any better at the fuel pump. The EPA rates the new GT at 14 mpg overall, with an 11 mpg rating for the city, and 18 mpg for the highway.
The 12-year old GT from 2005 got the same overall mpg, and actually managed 1 mpg better ratings for the city and highway. The new GT's fuel economy number also means it will likely garner a Gas Guzzler Tax of $2,600. However, this tax could also be more or less, since the government uses unadjusted ratings that differ from the EPA numbers seen on Monroney stickers.
The new GT looks even thirstier when comparing it with its mid-engine rivals. The McLaren 570S, Ferrari 488 GTB, and Lamborghini Hurac?n, all top the American supercar in almost every fuel economy measure. All three manage to top 20 mpg on the highway, with the Lambo bringing up the rear with 21 mpg, and the McLaren coming out ahead with 23 mpg. The lead extends to city mileage, too, with the McLaren leading the charge again with 16 mpg, and the Lamborghini falling to the bottom with 14 mpg. And it's worth noting that two of these cars use turbocharged V8s, and one a naturally aspirated V10.