Viggen said:
These are good, but I don't know. They look pretty bland and doesn't really scream "racy" and "adventurous" like other examples, in my opinion.
The site makes it adventurous. your logo should not be adventurous or racy.
Here is why...
1. Your logo must be able to stand reduced on stationairy. The use of wordy text only makes it impossible to reduce.
2. Your logo must use solid colors. The use of gradiant fill is too inconsitant when using print version. (Screen printing and gradient fill fuck up at the edges of the percentage - i.e. 0-20% and 80-100% fills)
3. Your logo must have a 'center feel' with breathing consistant space (often equivalent to 50% of the size of the logo) surrounding it.
Other notes:
1. Using a wide range of color is a last resort as it is very costly to use on stationairy after.
Been doing logos and websites for over 10 years now.
But whatever tickles your fancy. Just my 2 cents.
I think it looks good in a banner.