bigfoot1942
Well-Known Member
how about "experience"Renesis said:can't wait to admire it
"view" isn't appropriate anymore 8)
though we only need HDTV and AC3 for that...
how about "experience"Renesis said:can't wait to admire it
"view" isn't appropriate anymore 8)
that was just future-talkVUK said:HDTV is only in usa i think, AC3 is not broadcasted here yet
What was the resolution on that Shrek video (not a good test since it's animation BTW), if it is truly HDTV, it should have been 1280x720 or 1920x1080.bigfoot1942 said:that was just future-talkVUK said:HDTV is only in usa i think, AC3 is not broadcasted here yet
HDTV will come to europe as well, i believe.
anyhow, HDTV is an amazing standard, ive downloaded Shrek in HDTV format... the image was extremely supersharp
ESPNSTI said:^^ I was really hoping the future of HD wouldn't involve Windows Media, but oh well, guess you can't stop Microsoft.
i believe it was the 1920 by 1080 res.ESPNSTI said:What was the resolution on that Shrek video (not a good test since it's animation BTW), if it is truly HDTV, it should have been 1280x720 or 1920x1080.bigfoot1942 said:that was just future-talkVUK said:HDTV is only in usa i think, AC3 is not broadcasted here yet
HDTV will come to europe as well, i believe.
anyhow, HDTV is an amazing standard, ive downloaded Shrek in HDTV format... the image was extremely supersharp
I would think that the only advantage of HDTV over what we have now is the increase in resolution (which means bigger file size if you want to capture it), otherwise I would think that the image quality (given equal resolution) would be about the same.
I can't wait to see how good H264, AAC and the MP4 container will work in the next year or so .