Aren't you destroying walls if you crash?
Aren't you destroying walls if you crash?
Well, at least that'll end in millions of collateral damage, which will show the organizers how much they fail.
There is a clear warning sign on their map.It is alarming how many endurance race drivers still do not know about this... Seems like there has been no information from the side of the N?rburgring about the astroturf, atleast in the form of some cautioning.
Some pavement run off area or, better yet, more rumble-strip berms would have been better. I might think cheaper in the long run. Pavement costs more, but it will save on accidents, which is what the focus should be anyway. Wider runoff areas have been a huge help at a couple of corners at Laguna Seca. Both in terms of driver safety and in the interest of keeping the event going. Even standard asphault could be laid down, even with a different texture or angle so it could be used when someone does turn in too soon.
Mazda Raceway also has astroturf. It's on the exit of turn 11. Lots of people use it every lap with little detriment. They have to replace it every few months because it gets used so much. Also remember that the pavement runoffs added to tracks like Watkins Glen and Mazda Raceway are positioned in the middle of the corner and do not get used for better lap times. Those latest additions to Watkins and Laguna are useful for mid-corner spins or overcooking the entry. This is a different situation. If you add more road on the exit it will get used for better lap times and the dirt will still be there at the edge. Or worse, straight into a wall.
The old dirt at the corner used to eat cars too.
Ultimately, you can put rumble strips in and think you're giving everyone some more room for error, but in reality all they will do is carry more speed and use up more road. Same with pavement. Then you're back to square one which is a low grip surface on the edge of the road.
The reality is there is no solution to runoff on corner exit and whether it's sand, mud, grass, or astroturf the rules are simple: don't touch it if you don't want to lose traction.
That is the best method. My thinking was that there has to be something better than putting in a slick substance at a place where you need grip. The more pavement you add, the more people will use it, but I just have to think there is a better solution that turf.
Unless you prefer walls, the usual dirt n' grass combo is kind of the best of a number of poisons. Until some magic substance is invented that slows cars and doesn't give better lap times by using it, then that's kind of the best option.
Well, there's gravel, but that doesn't work in all circumstances, you need lots of it, and it introduces a whole host of new problems when cars spill it on the track.
So does this mean that the "Green Hell" is now the "Artificial Green Hell"?
I think the discussion is not relevant to the title of the post.