go to wikipedia and check Steve Millens past. he was NOT sandbagging this. GT-R was just easier to drive fast than other two. you should also go to road and tracks forums and check out what one of the editors says about the run.
http://forums.roadandtrack.com/cars/board/message?board.id=Reader&thread.id=138
From the editor of R&T
"Normally I would ignore this type of post, but since I know who you are I'll comment. Steve Millen did not sandbag. Steve has been a trusted friend of this magazine for years. The fact that he's won endurance races at Sebring, Daytona and LeMans should be enough qualifications, but if in doubt he's won plenty others. Steve gets paid to go fast consistantly, never to go slow.
As for his ties with Nissan, I doubt he would have anything to gain by lieing about a product. He surely didn't when he drove a 350Z for us back in 2005 during the Best All-Around Sports Car story.
When I first heard the results of the GT-R test I had a similar reaction you did. That of "no way" is the GT-R 5-seconds a lap quicker! Having the resources to look at the collected GPS data I proceeded to explore what happened. Turns out the GT-R has better tires and the AWD technology to put them to use. Lots of other factors, but I assure you Steve didn't hold back in the Z06. Nothing in the data would suggest that. The fact that the 911 Turbo and Z06 ran nearly identical times is as expected from all previous testing of the two cars.
Best,
-Shaun
P.S. If I'm wrong Motonishi-san can have my job."
How do you mean? The AWD system isn't as active as everyone thinks it is, like an evo. ATTESSA ET-S is pretty simple in comparison, most of the time the GT-R is 2/98 front-back. When things get out of shape based on rear traction and a series of yaw sensors and accelerometers the car can shift power forward up to 50/50. It's designed to be as RWD as possible and ONLY bring in the fronts when they're absolutely needed.
Just goes to show Chevy's suspension engineers still have some learning to do.
How do you mean? The AWD system isn't as active as everyone thinks it is, like an evo. ATTESSA ET-S is pretty simple in comparison, most of the time the GT-R is 2/98 front-back. When things get out of shape based on rear traction and a series of yaw sensors and accelerometers the car can shift power forward up to 50/50.
It's designed to be as RWD as possible and ONLY bring in the fronts when they're absolutely needed.
I am a lil' bias but each have their time and place. If the Zo6 had a better suspension, more technology, or AWD it would easily beat the others
If a Toyota Prius had a Flux Capacitor, it'd easily be the fastest car ever.
You DO realize that you have to reach 88 miles per hour...? *scratches head*
Its a Prius. You'd probably just have to reach 88mpg.
A combination of a short and twisty track, and a a well known former NISSAN FACTORY DRIVER AND RACER.........excellent combinations there.
Porsche and GM were free to offer similar staffing for their vehicles. They didn't. They suffer the consequences.