• The development of any software program, including, but not limited to, training a machine learning or artificial intelligence (AI) system, is prohibited using the contents and materials on this website.

Random Thoughts... [Automotive Edition]

I have done a stupid and agreed to buy a major project car. From 1956.
 
The interior of the new Lincoln Navigator looks like a very nice time to spend a drive. However, the exterior just isn't imposing or "substantial" enough for who I think normally shops for that type of car, so I suspect it'll fail to capture much of the market.
 
Matt2000 said:
I've always thought of those tow bar solutions as the best option, having grown up with awful contraptions that clamp to the boot lid. They're at least difficult to fuck up. :p

Thule even make a tow bar tent, I was checking it out at a show earlier in the year. Sadly too big to work with the Mazda (the packed tent would be taller than the car) even if it could have a tow bar, and I think it's a bit espensive for what it is.
Click to expand...
Yup I can confirm, the "clamp this side to the rear hatch and the other side to the glass, it'll be fine" things DO work, but I'm very nervous and basically drive around like I'm a million years old. It's also nearly impossible to do without scratching the paint and I kinda hate that.

Sure the proper towbar setup is (a lot) more espensive (this is what this word is now), but also a whole lot better. I've had one for I think 7 years now for the kids bikes, and it's still being used weekly without any faff. Getting the plug for the lights in properly is a hassle in my car because of the stupid location of the plug (it involves almost lying on the ground groping around at something you can barely see and hoping for it to bite *not a euphemism*), but I've become adequate at it. Only thing we needed to replace in all that time is the grabby thingy that holds the bike (because they had worn out from using and wouldn't clamp down hard enough).

Also also, you can do this if you want more luggage space and not compromise aero efficiency/ fuel consumption :

550x389.jpg


In other news : took my wife's car to the MOT station, where several miracles happened in quick succession

1) the whole thing took less than 30 minutes, waiting twice (once in line to get in, once in line to pay for this privilege) included
2) while thorough, the guys doing it didn't seem hellbent on finding something stupid so they can fail me. They did check for stupid stuff though like "do all the seatbelts close and retract properly, and what is the expiry date on the fire extinguisher, which has never happened to me before
3) perhaps related to 2), there were NO remarks. I've had "keep an eye on that rust on the exhaust" remarks, only for me to return 2 years later and there being no remark at all .... which is it? Because rust doesn't vanish by itself and I did exactly nothing to remedy this nonexistant problem

So all in all, it passed, it didn't take half a day, and I'm happy as can be!
 
IMG_5550.jpeg

Drove this eC4 loaner for a few hrs, too short to do a proper review, but here’s 2 things I like and 2 things I hate

👍
It has the only kind of keyless go system you want : the one that opens as soon as you walk up to it, and automatically closes (with a tiny beep) if you walk off. I don’t know why not all systems have this, it basically eliminates the need to press the keyfob. My kia still needs a press to lock it, which I often forget, and then it sends me text messages to tell me.

It has wireless Carplay. Again, my car needs a cable to be plugged in, this just works. It’s also quick and snappy and doesn’t need any user input after the first pairing. Good!

👎
It has a weird boot spoiler thing that runs across the rear window, cutting it in half and ruining the little rear visibility you have. Yes it has a backup camera but this smells of being weird for the sake of it.

The regen needs to be set at every startup and is nowhere near strong enough. Also, it creeps if you let go of the brake pedal and there’s no auto hill hold. No major problem but an annoying one (and I’m very petty)

Bonus hate fact : the correct name for this car is the ëC4 not the eC4 or C4e. This bugs me because its pointless and daft

Overall a pretty decent car, good ride, decent interior space, with acceptable range (300ish kms)
 
Last edited:

Volkswagen has ‘a year, maybe two to turn around’, financial chief warns​

Click to expand...
www.theguardian.com

Volkswagen has ‘a year, maybe two to turn around’, financial chief warns

Carmaker defends plan to close German plants as Volvo ditches target to sell only electric cars by 2030
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com


VW partner Xpeng aims to build EVs in Europe to blunt tariffs​

Click to expand...
 
Dammit, you are even more pedantic than I am! And even worse, you are technically correct (which is the best kind of correct)

I will however say this : does there exist a language (other than Dutch which is weird ik itself) where you get an ë? And do the ‘points’ make it sound different?

Let’s just all agree to stop putting an E in the name of every car name/model, let’s have proper names of cars instead of BZ4x or whatever that Toyota is called
 
Since I'll have to hand in my company car in the coming weeks and I'll be needing some temporary wheels I've been looking at cheaps cars that are both cheap to buy (sub 3000euro range) and also affordable tax-wise with a tax for registering used cars which can be more than what you pay for the car if you buy something with an engine bigger than 2liters.
Most sensible options are 2000-2010 Fords or Citroëns with 1.4-1.6 liter petrol engines (= usualy lower taxes): they can be found in the 1500-2500euro range and many of them are stationwagons which I prefer. Don't really need or care too much for luxury since I don't plan on driving/owning it for very long.
But today I stumbled upon a Jaguar X-type stationwagon. It's only a 2.0 diesel with only 130hp, a lot more comfort/options/luxury than the mostly early 2000's Ford Focuses I've been looking at, taxes aren't too bad and I know it's more Ford Mondeo than Jaguar but it's actually itching to go have a look purely to check off the "having owned a Jaaaaaaaag" box 😂 .
 
kalf said:
Since I'll have to hand in my company car in the coming weeks and I'll be needing some temporary wheels I've been looking at cheaps cars that are both cheap to buy (sub 3000euro range) and also affordable tax-wise with a tax for registering used cars which can be more than what you pay for the car if you buy something with an engine bigger than 2liters.
Most sensible options are 2000-2010 Fords or Citroëns with 1.4-1.6 liter petrol engines (= usualy lower taxes): they can be found in the 1500-2500euro range and many of them are stationwagons which I prefer. Don't really need or care too much for luxury since I don't plan on driving/owning it for very long.
But today I stumbled upon a Jaguar X-type stationwagon. It's only a 2.0 diesel with only 130hp, a lot more comfort/options/luxury than the mostly early 2000's Ford Focuses I've been looking at, taxes aren't too bad and I know it's more Ford Mondeo than Jaguar but it's actually itching to go have a look purely to check off the "having owned a Jaaaaaaaag" box 😂 .
Click to expand...

What if.... Citroen Plurial? :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top