Hmm... apart from the C-pillar shenanigans, I don't really see anything that is all that similar between the two to be honest Can't comment on interior of course, just going off those two pictures you posted.
Coincidences, how do they work?H1 Hummer towing a caravan... 40 miles behind was a H2 towing a caravan, I have many many questions.
Coincidences, how do they work?
I wish more states would do this.
Not sure if this is automotive or political, or both. But it sure is random . On the matter of Trumps latest blabla.
Remember when complete elimination of something was ever a realistic goal? Me neither. Remember when making a significant reduction in something happened? We're living in it.Hey remember when they introduced fines for speeding and people stopped speeding? No? Me neither.
You unamerican, liberty-hating commie!Remember when complete elimination of something was ever a realistic goal? Me neither. Remember when making a significant reduction in something happened? We're living in it.
Remember when complete elimination of something was ever a realistic goal? Me neither. Remember when making a significant reduction in something happened? We're living in it.
some science dudes said:Results
For speeding in general, no effect of increasing fixed penalties can be found. For speeding close to speed camera sites, there is a weak tendency for the violation rate to go down. This tendency is not statistically significant at conventional levels.
You unamerican, liberty-hating commie!
So there were penalties beforehand but with lower rates. Meanwhile, that rolling coal law is going from no penalties to some penalties. Not directly comparable.During the years 1995?2004, the rates for fixed penalties for traffic offences in Norway increased substantially
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437507001272
So even when receiving a ticket is nearly a guarantee people still do it.
Just a non-realist
Sure it's not directly comparable but it's a pretty decent indicator of how effective something like that might be. Also remember that to roll coal one has to spend some money modifying the truck in the first place. It's just going to be same as it is with speeding, drifting, burnouts, etc... People will look out for 5-0 and do it when they are reasonably sure none is around.So there were penalties beforehand but with lower rates. Meanwhile, that rolling coal law is going from no penalties to some penalties. Not directly comparable.
2 ThingsThere are assholes in every crowd.
suggests that the number of assholes is relatively constant and brings us toThis tendency is not statistically significant at conventional levels.
Riiight, because basing opinions on statistical studies done for similar regulations is so completely unrealistic...Look in the mirror.
Yup. I expect a non-negligible number of coal rollers or potential coal rollers are cowardly enough to give up their habit soon as they hear the ban being actually enforced. So how about we take the scientific approach and let the trial run its course the way that paper did?Do you seriously think that the type of people to roll coal would be deterred in any noticeable way? It's just going to be same as it is with speeding, drifting, burnouts, etc... People will look out for 5-0 and do it when they are reasonably sure none is around.
Yup. I expect a non-negligible number of coal rollers or potential coal rollers are cowardly enough to give up their habit soon as they hear the ban being actually enforced. So how about we take the scientific approach and let the trial run its course the way that paper did?