I don't dispute any of this, if you look at my post I stated that no one was charged with a crime and agreed that the noose was in the garage last year. I never said it was a hate crime, but I applauded those who rallied in support of Wallace when the perception of a hate crime was there given the current context. I believe that I said the support was the story, not the noose.
However, I was not the one who tried to spin this into the noose being a "hand loop". If the facts are that the noose wasn't targeted at Wallace, then let those facts speak for themselves; when someone starts conflating facts with spin, I can't help but question their motives and every point of their argument. You undermine your own credibility when you do this; the same is true for selectively taking pot shots with small points while missing the larger issues of the debate. If someone is unable to participate in the entire conversation, they are welcome to pipe down until they have a cohesive, consistent, and evidence-based contribution. Piping up with "objection" from the peanut gallery is little more than the distraction offered by a misbehaving child.