- Joined
- Aug 26, 2005
- Messages
- 4,693
- Location
- Denver, CO
- Car(s)
- It's A HONDA! Clarity Plug In Electric
Many things were fantasies, before they became reality. It might as well happen to this one.
You are suggesting getting rid of property rights. I wish you luck in your political endeavor.
Sure it is. I own something. I make commercially available. If customers do not want it, I no longer produce it. If they do want it, I produce it and receive something in exchange. As I see you are doubling down on your viewpoint, fine, an example of that is licensing rights. I can give you my licensing rights in exchange for money.
Ownership is complete control including abuse and neglect of the the property.
Canceling it altogether is morally wrong,
That is a very very far bridge to cross. For one individual property rights are human rights but more so ownership of property by companies provides for the essential ability to exist. It is the right of the property owner to alter the product or brand marketing as they see fit there is no moral requirement to include original markings see below
Hey, I still can't over Land 'O Lakes butter no longer has the Native American on the box. Using butter now does not feel the same.
Good example of a brand making a choice to get out in front of market perception. To say that they are bound to the original marketing of their butter product is laughable we would still have Niggerhair Tobacco.
Had they simply modified the logo/name in an organic manner, nobody would have complained.
You put too much faith in these complainers. Also lets note they are saying that plastic potatoes have sex organs after all to not have a sex would mean that gender is a social construct humans relate by visible plastic accessories. You called it virtue signaling I call it accepting its plastic potato.
because burying it will give it that Forbidden fruit status that makes the fringe crazies want to see it or because you give those people that you hate proper ammunition that "THE LIBRULS ARE CANCELING EVERYTHING", as you no doubt perceive that they are going.
If you want to look at drawings of slanty eyed yellow demons go nuts. You want illustrations of black children as pigmy Gold Dust Twins adorning your walls go nuts. What im saying is the companies shouldn't be forced to continue to produce those works. I dont hate Conservatives if they were talking about conservative things like fiscal policy which could be debated but forcing businesses to print offensive material because of thats the way its always got to be is messed up and exactly what you are calling for.