Artificial intelligence is great. Not. Especially not when it's used to cheap out on actually understanding humans' input:
Source: The Verge article
Now, from the article, I suspect "artificial intelligence" is quite an exaggeration of what the grading algorithm of that software actually does. Even though AI is really just a fancy way of saying "statistical analysis", cutting-edge technology in this field is a bit better than just string matching against a word list.
Artificial intelligence is great. Not. Especially not when it's used to cheap out on actually understanding humans' input:
Source: The Verge article
Now, from the article, I suspect "artificial intelligence" is quite an exaggeration of what the grading algorithm of that software actually does. Even though AI is really just a fancy way of saying "statistical analysis", cutting-edge technology in this field is a bit better than just string matching against a word list.
That isn't much different than most low level college courses, let alone K-12. Even with a professor teaching, I've gotten away with answers not much different.
I'd run out of time on a test and just jot answers like: Venice: Italy, trade, city-state, Fourth Crusade, swamp people. And get 4 out of 5 on that answer.
Why does a pregnancy test need a screen like this? Why do geeks keep running Doom on strange things? These are just some of the questions that will never be answered to my satisfaction in my lifetime.
I used to see pictures of old HP printers that had displays. People were changing the normal "PC Load Letter" errors to say "feed me humans" or some such. Is that still possible?
I used to see pictures of old HP printers that had displays. People were changing the normal "PC Load Letter" errors to say "feed me humans" or some such. Is that still possible?