NooDle
Ik ben niet alleen lekker met kaas!
I actually posted about this once. I good 40% of women's dress pants have no pockets at all. Another 40% of pockets that are too small for a pack of gum and thus useless. The remaining 20% can carry ONE useful item (either wallet or cell phone) IF you've bought them a size too large and don't mind having odd lumps. Because our hips fill out the pocket area instead of our pants hanging straight down from the waist, there's very little room in general. You should look at how the pockets are structured in women's pants. You'll be amazed how non-functional it is. 95% of dresses/skirts have no pockets at all so if you're wearing that you definitely need the purse. Even jeans are probably only 70% functionally pocketed.
Carrying more than just a wallet and phone is a personal choice that derives from simply being able to. If I'm stuck carrying a purse, I might as well have some advil, chap stick, a small tape measure, my check book and a pen, and all the other things I find myself often needing.
I think the whole evolution of women's pants went the other way, as in the designers thinking "pockets? We don't need no steenkin' POCKETS because gurls have purses".
Also, women's pants are weird, they're usually way too high up.
And I wear my odd lumps with pride! Men need nothing more than a wallet and a cellphone, period. AiR may say we also need moisturizer but take it from me that he's wrong. WRONG I TELLS YA!