No, but we have other bitches. SD only has SD bitches.
Side-note: I'm very happy you're on 'ere, as it's quite entertaining to poke fun at a local, as the Germans and Scandinavians have been doing for an eternity.
As am I. Most of my LA friends that I make fun of don't play along and end up succumbing going "Yeah I miss SD, it's an awesome place". They can't find a proper reason to put it down! :lol:
I think it's cute, you boys talking about the merits of LA women versus SD women - when we all know they aren't worthy of holding a Northern CA woman's purse! The women here don't need fake tans and boob jobs - they are secure enough in their feminity and have buckets of self esteem.
A little too much self-esteem, actually; as none of them are willing to lower their standards enough to date me.
So I grew up in SD but got my bach. in nor cal. My first and only SERIOUS girlfriend was a native norcalian. She now ironically lives in Irvine. They all have great attitudes, I must say, but from what I saw, I would look at a girl on the Berkeley campus from behind and be like "damn what a nice ass, and what great long flowing hair". EY GURL LEMME GET A PIKACHU. And then when they turn around, they looking something not unlike this:
And the thing is, they think they're super cute, and I'm like dude YOU WERE super cute before you put on that egotistical face on, and then the bear costume.
I have been to LA, My parents and I visited my brother when he lived near Hollywood in this crappy neighborhood called SilverLake, or as he called it, Silverfish.
Los Angeles horrified me, I will never go back again. Call me a prude or uptight, but that city is fucked up.
Did I ever mention... that I love you
. Yeah thanks for gettin my back. You're a very very smart person as I've always said.
:lol: You're funny. Just about every single girl I've met from the Bay is as uptight as the worst of SD's bleached, fake-tanned blondes. Which is to say as uptight as Hollywood's hopefuls.
The main reason I'm adamant LA wins is because there is enough variety here to make it easy (or at least easier) to find the cool ones. I'm not personally too familiar with Northern California, but in SD I only managed to find a plethora of dumb, shallow, personality free hotties with a side of unattractive, antisocial brainiacs from UCSD. Not what I'd call a workable selection.
And just in case we're gettin' all serious up in 'ere, obviously none of this is 100% guaranteed. Some of the most interesting and attractive women I've met were my classmates at UCSD. It's just that I found the averages rather...discouraging.
SD girls are undeniably pretty. The sun does something wonderful to everyone here and anyone visiting. And that's not a bias, as I've left the area and was totally dying and missing it all when I was away. But depending on where you go and who you look for, you can find some of the WORST most SHALLOW pieces of shit in the world. Take my high school classmate Crystal Harris, who graduated the same year as me. Yeah that's right. Crystal harris, the one who almost married Hugh Hefner of Playboy Crystal Harris.
She was always a cutie in high school, always good to look at, but never someone I feel I could get into deep conversations with. Sure she studied psychology but which hot girl in San Diego who has no idea wtf they're doing with their life doesn't study psychology? She was a very nice person, kept mostly to herself, but didn't come off too pretentious. When she did open her mouth you could tell she was just "one of those typical blonde SD chicks".
Then take a look at another friend of mine.
She may not have the same sort-of appearance as Crystal, but you can't deny that she is cute. This girl was actually smart, down-to-earth, and was always smiling and always cheerful. She was competitive and was on the cheerleading squad if I remember right, and unlike the other girls of the popular group, she wasn't afraid to talk to a complete nerd like me and "ruin her image". She was a friend of the moderately popular group
. So I guess it's all really in where you look at.
LA girls are also pretty in certain areas (aka not in compton and all that). My hatred with LA comes from the traffic, the fact that it essentially stole SD's airport (and we have a natural port unlike you guys!), and the general environment. I like the mixture and infusion of races and cultures, it is quite spectacular... but I can see all that and even more up in nor cal. If you want racial and sexual co-existence, the first words that should come out of your mouth should be "San Francisco". Everyone just gets along.
Having visited both NorCal, LA, and SD I can vote as an objective outsider. SD has the most beautiful California girls, LA has more beautiful girls in general as many are imported from across the country, and SF has a leg up on the smart, go getter type of girls.
That being said, I like SD. The girls are cuter, the beaches are better, there are less celebrities and it's close to TJ(which was fun before Mexicans decided to have a war). Coastal LA is great but the valley is a horrible wasteland of murderous temperatures and nothing of value so that deducts points. SF is nice but it's cold in a bad way. Not awesome winter snow cold, but damp foggy only is nice once in a while cold. I will say that it's educational institutions are second to none, and has in my mind THE best public and private universities in the country located just minutes from each other.
Dat's my dawg! <fist pumps>