Also, what I don't understand is 12 hours ago..
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/jeremy-clarkson-says-no-television-5958732
It's what I was getting at in the other thread -- the UK press will apparently publish ANYTHING if they think it'll get a page click. And The Mirror very quite likely could be the worst of them all.
That's why I titled the thread "It's on ITV??" instead of "It's on ITV!!"
The dad-of-two, who has lived apart from wife Frances for three years, was seen listening intently to her in the VIP area at the Sixties legends? concert.
More from the Mirror:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/top-gear-follow-up-jeremy-clarkson-6015274
"ITV won?t be able to screen a Jeremy Clarkson Top Gear follow-up until 2017 because of a legal hitch.
A clause in Clarkson?s BBC contract is stopping him and fellow Top Gear hosts James May and Richard Hammond, from making a rival car show on a UK channel for two years."
They report, we decide (if it's garbage or not)?
More from the Mirror:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/top-gear-follow-up-jeremy-clarkson-6015274
"ITV won?t be able to screen a Jeremy Clarkson Top Gear follow-up until 2017 because of a legal hitch.
A clause in Clarkson?s BBC contract is stopping him and fellow Top Gear hosts James May and Richard Hammond, from making a rival car show on a UK channel for two years."
They report, we decide (if it's garbage or not)?
But if all three are out of contract, how is the contract binding? Surely for such a clause to be still binding the contract would have to still be current?