Since im new here, so maybe my view will carry no weight at all. But here what i have to say. I have done quite a few encoding task. It seems to layman like me that Nero H.264 implementation is better than anything else at least at this moment. As a consequence, we can get a better quality with the same file size or the same quality with smaller file size. So what do think?Cruzz563 said:The video will still be XviD and the audio will still be MP3.
Duh. :lol:justin syder said:anyone notice Xvid is Divx in reverse?
WOOOOOWWW :lol:
MyBoy said:Since im new here, so maybe my view will carry no weight at all. But here what i have to say. I have done quite a few encoding task. It seems to layman like me that Nero H.264 implementation is better than anything else at least at this moment. As a consequence, we can get a better quality with the same file size or the same quality with smaller file size. So what do think?Cruzz563 said:The video will still be XviD and the audio will still be MP3.
Thanks for your kind respond buddy.Cruzz563 said:This has been discussed before along with the WMV-HD codec, in the forum and in the IRC channel. We don't really want to use it cause not everyone has a fast enough processor to decode the video.