Sir Stiggington
Well-Known Member
Guys, it's not about reducing the drag at the airbox, it's about airflow to the rear wing. lower airbox=cleaner airflow to the rear wing, that's all.
Don't those apply to the roll hoop and maximum height, though, and not the air inlets themselves?
Guys, it's not about reducing the drag at the airbox, it's about airflow to the rear wing. lower airbox=cleaner airflow to the rear wing, that's all.
Guys, it's not about reducing the drag at the airbox, it's about airflow to the rear wing. lower airbox=cleaner airflow to the rear wing, that's all.
According Brawn (AMuS), the change also brings better engine cooling, in addition to a better flow to the rear wing and reduced drag.
AMuS says that the aero updates alone should bring 0,3-0,4 seconds gain, without taking into account the laptime improvement the extended wheelbase should bring.
Well, you specifically said that it's not about reducing the drag at the airbox. So in that sense, I'd say yes, it's disagree
Guys, it's not about reducing the drag at the airbox, it's about airflow to the rear wing. lower airbox=cleaner airflow to the rear wing, that's all.
I really like that new Lotus front wing.
I seriously doubt they'll ban the F-duct, but as for the DDD it's true. And it was the same for KERS, and for the tyres now. You can't cut costs, be green, AND solve overtaking all at the same time.
Ah, but simply doing everything you just said would be a HUGE cost to teams.