nsx_23
Forum Addict
- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 7,709
You're an evil man. Way to make me look slighty insane.
I was going to ask how your comment related to me wanting an RC8
So much want:
Last edited:
You're an evil man. Way to make me look slighty insane.
1885: Gottlieb Daimler patents what is generally considered to be the first true motorcycle.
Daimler, the automotive pioneer usually associated with building the world?s first successful internal combustion engine (and, subsequently, the first automobile), staked his claim of priority in the two-wheeler world a year before developing his famous auto.
However, the idea of a motor-driven, two-wheeled vehicle did not originate with Daimler, nor was his the first such contraption to see the road. Sylvester Roper, who spent the U.S. Civil War working in a Union armory, built a primitive ?motorcycle? as early as 1867. Roper?s supporters ? and he has more than a few ? argue that he should be credited with building the world?s first motorcycle.
What gives credibility to Daimler?s claim of developing the first ?true? motorcycle is the fact that it was gasoline-driven. Roper?s post?Civil War hog, with a tiny two-cylinder engine, was powered by steam.
Daimler?s motorcycle was essentially a wooden bicycle frame (with foot pedals removed) powered by a one-cylinder Otto-cycle engine. It may have also included a spray-type carburetor, then under development for use in the Daimler automobile that appeared in 1886.
I got a chance to ride that. Cramped as hell for someone my size, but a fantastic bike.
It's just you, it still has the Bungled "WTF" face.
I am not talking about aesthetics, but build quality.
Wow...
Seems I was fooled by the shiny metal and nice welding.
Wow...
Seems I was fooled by the shiny metal and nice welding.
Looks like alot of that shiny metal found it's way onto the drain plug. :lol:
I wondered too how did they managed to achieve so much more hp than the Japanese companies that are playing that game for much longer. There we have it.I'd also point out that despite all the gimcrackery gadgets and tech on the bike and it's much vaunted about-200-hp rating... it's still slower than a box-stock CBR1000RR C-ABS, which is slightly cheaper. ($14800 for the 2011 S1000RR, $14399 for the 2011 CBR1000RR C-ABS. If you want it without ABS, the CBR drops to $13399.)
Maybe BMW should have spent less time and money on the gadgets and 'streamlined iDrive' and more time on the 'motor' part of the motorcycle. It's pretty obvious that the motor isn't where all the money is going to.
I think in a few months, somebody's going to have to write me a Ducati Monster Buyer's Guide.