prizrak
Forum Addict
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2007
- Messages
- 21,574
- Location
- No, sleep, till, BROOKLYN
- Car(s)
- 11 Xterra Pro-4x, 12 'stang GT
Umm:
1 - They were trying to breach the fence were they not?
2 - So dropping tear gas to disperse an unruly violent mob is now an incursion?
3 - Yes when you try to enter a secure area you tend to get stopped BEFORE you get in not after, again this would be within US rules of engagement.
You call Israel an aggressor but far as I understand it, Israeli forces didn't go in there and start randomly shooting, they were up against a violent mob. This is the part that boggles my mind when it comes to how you treat the situation. This is a violent mob, it's not a peaceful protest, that mob had a large number of members of a known terrorist organization in it (as admitted by said organization). Israelis tried to disperse it with non-lethal means first and when it failed they went to measures of last resort. How much leeway do you give terrorists before you take them down?
P.S. What would you have done?
1 - They were trying to breach the fence were they not?
2 - So dropping tear gas to disperse an unruly violent mob is now an incursion?
3 - Yes when you try to enter a secure area you tend to get stopped BEFORE you get in not after, again this would be within US rules of engagement.
You call Israel an aggressor but far as I understand it, Israeli forces didn't go in there and start randomly shooting, they were up against a violent mob. This is the part that boggles my mind when it comes to how you treat the situation. This is a violent mob, it's not a peaceful protest, that mob had a large number of members of a known terrorist organization in it (as admitted by said organization). Israelis tried to disperse it with non-lethal means first and when it failed they went to measures of last resort. How much leeway do you give terrorists before you take them down?
P.S. What would you have done?
Last edited: