Spectre
The Deported
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2007
- Messages
- 36,832
- Location
- Dallas, Texas
- Car(s)
- 00 4Runner | 02 919 | 87 XJ6 | 86 CB700SC
Isn't it supposed to go to Union Station in LA? That is infinitely better for connections to the LA Metro than the airport. Since driving in the LA area is annoying at the best of times, the subway is a good choice unless a) you won't be caught dead on public transport, in which case the HST probably isn't for you anyway or b) there really is no way to get from a metro station to your destination on foot or by bus/taxi/ride-share/other.
Nobody takes Metro with luggage unless they want to be mugged and lose all their stuff. It's *that* kind of public transit system. The buses are even worse.
- - - Updated - - -
http://www.scpr.org/news/2016/12/01/66696/metro-board-takes-up-policing-in-wake-of-continuin/
LA policing ranked unfavorably in audit
The move to beef up security follows an audit of Metro's policing, conducted last year by the agency's Office of the Inspector General, that compared Los Angeles unfavorably to other major transit systems.
While it noted the crime and emergency call rate was not high, the audit showed L.A. Metro had a higher rate of serious crimes in 2014 than Chicago, Washington, D.C., Boston and Philadelphia.
Only San Francisco?s BART system had a higher incidence of crimes, although the majority of those cases involved petty theft while L.A.?s rate of violent crimes, including homicide and rape, was higher.