I'm writing this from XP, and I have several windows open and is able to multitask efficiently with ease with software over a decade old. Funny how that works. Now some more truths:
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/121015-windows-8-may-drive-me-to-linux
The thing is, Microsoft does not push people to upgrade their existing OS. They achieve that by pushing computer makers to preinstall the latest Microsoft Windows, and only supply a recovery disc/partition, making sure the average user does not install anything else. In fact, some versions of Windows 8 will
lock out all other operating systems from even being possible to install. So if you buy a new computer, it'll come with Windows 8, and that's where the fun begins. I can't wait to see what happens when Microsoft alienates millions of people with a Windows without windows. I envision the end of Microsofts desktop monopoly.
1. The ExtremeTech (they've obviously went downhill since 08) author is wrong on several counts.
* running 2 windows side by side is certainly doable. I've done it several times since running consumer preview and it works the way it always has.
*exiting metro apps: you can by simply grabbing the top and pulling down and off the screen. Easily accomplished by a click-hold and flick down of the mouse with no real time difference.
2. Windows 8 secure boot only affects ARM based tablets. Many agree that these are essentially iPad devices. No one in their right mind tries to install Ubuntu on an iPad? Why on earth would you want to? A more limited app selection, a UI not designed for touch, I could go on and on. Non starter, especially since one will be able to buy x86 based tablets that'll be as thin and as light as the ARM ones.
Do people try on Android tablets? Sure, in emulation and in some cases on the device for "real", but it's simply a (very cool) novelty. These ARM tablets are meant to be seen as appliance like to the general public. They pick them up and they just plain work. 99% of the ARM tablet user population likely couldn't care less if a full blown linux distro runs on their tablet. If they get a non crashy tablet that gets epic battery life and has the tablet optimized apps they want, they're happy.
If you buy a new computer, indeed it'll come with Windows 8. It doesn't mean that there won't be ways around that though. Remember when Vista shipped, Dell, HP, and the like continued to sell machines shipping with XP for years..even consumer branded models in the Pavilion and Dimension/Inspiron lines due to a loophole in their agreement with Microsoft. I'm sure they'll find a way to ship with 7 for those not comfortable with 8.
I'm not suggesting that 8 is perfect, right clicking to display "app chrome" on non touch systems is a bit annoying, and the keyboard shortcuts to memorize a bit steep (i was never a fan of keyboard shortcuts to be honest...) but it's a lot less "zomg the world's ending" as enthusiast rags like to put out.
You can't please everyone. If Microsoft would have retained Windows 7's UI throughout the product, maybe made the title bar buttons even larger than the large defaults on systems with touch, improved the keyboard a little, and implemented kinetic scrolling/pinch zoom throughout the OS, they'd be blasted. "They're still not competing, where's the touch friendly UI and third party app model?"
If they would have went Metro the whole way, it would decimate the years of third party software that people love and accumulated over the years. More whinging in the press (and thus fanboys of those sites as well) would occur.
If they would have come out with separate editions for touch/non touch, the press (and their fanboys) would bitch again: "Too many editions!" "Microsoft never learns!" "Apple wins again ha haahaha!!11!"*
*Yes there is code in the Windows Registry that suggests that there will be multiple editions of Windows 8. They truly never learn....