Firecat
Politically Charged
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 5,730
President Bush instead has called for an 18 percent cut in the U.S. growth of greenhouse gases by 2012 and commits about $5 billion a year to global warming science and technology.
Firecat said:Re: the fox news article.
What do you guys think about all these hurricanes, earthquakes...the tsunami. Is it just a coincidence? Or is something seriously going on with the environment? Are things going to get worse?
Indeed, that's why I favor shifting focus from global warming to CO2 sinks, if you can solve that problem than global warming is almost a non-issue. The amount the seas will rise is also subject of heated debate in the scientific community, nobody really knows what will happen or how high they will get. Also remember that the oceans rising means they get deeper, it's always going to stay cold down deep, so it may in fact increase as a CO2 sink.jayjaya29 said:Yes but you forget one thing.
If the overall temperature of the Earth rises a few degrees, so with the oceans of the world. It is basic knowledge to know that when a liquid warms, the amount of dissolved gases (in this case CO2) it can hold is decreased. So if the temperature increases, the oceans warm up, and the amount of CO2 the oceans will hold drops. The ocean holds the most CO2 in the world, if the ocean temps rise a few degrees, the lost "storage" space could be catastrophic.
zenkidori said:Indeed, that's why I favor shifting focus from global warming to CO2 sinks, if you can solve that problem than global warming is almost a non-issue. The amount the seas will rise is also subject of heated debate in the scientific community, nobody really knows what will happen or how high they will get. Also remember that the oceans rising means they get deeper, it's always going to stay cold down deep, so it may in fact increase as a CO2 sink.jayjaya29 said:Yes but you forget one thing.
If the overall temperature of the Earth rises a few degrees, so with the oceans of the world. It is basic knowledge to know that when a liquid warms, the amount of dissolved gases (in this case CO2) it can hold is decreased. So if the temperature increases, the oceans warm up, and the amount of CO2 the oceans will hold drops. The ocean holds the most CO2 in the world, if the ocean temps rise a few degrees, the lost "storage" space could be catastrophic.
There is also that "day after tomorrow" theory thing as well, tho I don't buy it.
Thats really my whole point about climate change. Fact is that it has happened thousands of years before today. There is evidence that Antartica was a tropical paradise. But, note that was thousands of years ago. There were no cars, no industry, no nuclear powerplants, etc. Yet it happened. So, I dont think that we are entirely in control of our own destiny. The thing for me is just that I hate having smog all over the cities. Recently, here, it has been beautiful but sometimes it is pretty bad.zenkidori said:I think climate change is a reality, but there is evidence of it happening long before industrialization, so I'm skeptical that we are 100% to blame for it.
A far more pressing issue is the depletion of CO2 sinks, basically stuff that absorbs or converts CO2. If a large sink is used up the open air CO2 concentration will rise exponentially. I'm ok with melting glaciers and tropical climates, so long as I can breathe. There have been periods of stange and even catastrophic weather patterns in the past, but we're still here.
What do you guys think about all these hurricanes, earthquakes...the tsunami. Is it just a coincidence? Or is something seriously going on with the environment? Are things going to get worse?
The thing for me is just that I hate having smog all over the cities. Recently, here, it has been beautiful but sometimes it is pretty bad.
zenkidori said:I'm just musing, niether of us are oceanographers, my area is marine biology, and at an amateur level at that. I don't really know how CO2 is transmitted to the deeps, just that water is a huge sink. Perhaps a larger volume of water would make up for a decrease in efficiency. There's no replacement for displacement, heheh.
What is scary (and good in a way) is that it is significantly better than it was twenty years ago.zenkidori said:California, specificaly LA is horrible, here you can see mountains from MILES and MILES away, but out there foothills are hard to make out past the brown, and your eyes are always red and shit, blech.
Yeah I saw that movie too, I don't really buy it.haha604 said:Ttemperature rise in the atmosphere affects the direction of ocean currents. A consequence would be a much colder Europe because currently warm ocean currents keep Europe warmer than it otherwise would be.