Weed Smokers

I would do it more often if I had a source and or money to get me some. The only place I currently do it at is a friend's house and I don't do it all that often.

@Talaaya: I never saw the appeal until my friend had me try it, watched movies that were stupid sober but absolutely hilarious high. Personally I don't know the difference between high and stoned but I know that one bowl (right term? not sure) is good enough for me. It does a great job at relaxing you at the end of the day should you need to calm down. Also like RJ said, sex is so much more fantastic when high/stoned if it's great for you sober. The one thing that I don't like is the higher you get the more you want to munch food and if you want to shed weight... not a good idea. In my mind anyways.
 
Consuming marijuana is like any substance. It is not for everyone.
 
 
Tried for the first time last night.

It was awesome. I ate so much food :lol:
 
you should never toke when hungry. NEVER! :p
 
Marijuana Use Most Rampant in Australia, Study Finds


SYDNEY ? A study published Friday in a British medical journal may have finally uncovered the secret behind Australia?s laid-back lifestyle, and it turns out to be more than just sun and surf: The denizens Down Under, it turns out, consume more marijuana than any other people on the planet.


The study, an analysis of global trends in illegal drugs and their effect on public health published in The Lancet, a prestigious journal, found that Australia and neighboring New Zealand topped the lists globally for consumption of both marijuana and amphetamines, a category of drugs whose use the study found to be growing rapidly around the world.

The study?s co-authors, Professors Louisa Degenhardt of the University of New South Wales and Wayne Hall of the University of Queensland, reported that as much as 15 percent of the populations of Australia and New Zealand between the ages of 15 and 64 had used some form of marijuana in 2009, the latest year for which data were available.

The Americas, by comparison, clocked in at 7 percent, although North America batted above the neighborhood average with nearly 11 percent of its population partaking. Asia demonstrated the lowest global marijuana use patterns at no more than 2.5 percent, the study said, although difficulties in obtaining accurate data in less developed countries were cited as one possible reason for the low figures.

The results were not surprising and reflected trends that have been in place for more than a decade, Mr. Hall said in an interview on Australian radio Friday. Despite the high figures in the report, he said, the rate of marijuana use in Australia has actually been dropping ?steadily for the better part of a decade.?

Mr. Hall blamed both the ubiquity of the drug ? Australia and New Zealand have no shortage of remote rural areas where policing is difficult and the plant grows like, well, a weed ? and cultural mores that place the consumption of intoxicants at the center of social life.

?Just look at the way we take alcohol as an integral part of everyday life. I think a lot of young people see cannabis in the same way that we see alcohol: as no big deal, as a drug just to use to have a good time,? he said.

Stepping back for a global perspective, the study found that marijuana was the world?s most widely consumed illicit drug, with anywhere from 125 million to 203 million people partaking annually. Use of the drug far outstrips that of other illicit drugs globally, with 14 million to 56 million people estimated to use amphetamines, 14 million to 21 million estimated to use cocaine and 12 million to 21 million estimated to use opiates like heroin.

Still, despite marijuana?s significantly outpacing other illicit drugs in terms of the volume of use, the study found that it was the least likely of all illicit drugs to cause death. Additionally, barely 1 percent of deaths in Australia annually can be attributed to illegal drugs, the report said, compared with almost 12 percent from tobacco use.

The prevalence of marijuana use in Australia is widely accepted if not openly condoned, and at least three states have moved to decriminalize the possession of small quantities for personal use.

But the findings in the report most likely to cause concern to the Australian government were those relating to the use of amphetamines, and particularly methamphetamine, which has become a major public health concern over the past two decades. As much as 3 percent of the Australian population has used amphetamines like speed, compared with just 0.2 percent to 1.4 percent in Asia.
 
It's an edible day! See everyone in ~8h.
 
What did you fill it with?
 
besides weed, what else would you put in it??
 
. . . and stay away from alcohol, alcohol is the devil, and the worst drug out there!

A?id, ?o?aine, ?ra?k, inhalants, I can go on. Except for burning out brain cells and making you hungry MJ is no worse than unfiltered smokes.
 
besides weed, what else would you put in it??


I guess I was referring to a specific strain.

A?id, ?o?aine, ?ra?k, inhalants, I can go on. Except for burning out brain cells and making you hungry MJ is no worse than unfiltered smokes.

Marijuana does not burn out brain cells and it is far less harmful than filtered cigarettes. :rolleyes:


I may have to go on a rant about all the misconceptions about Cannabis (not a weed BTW) and educate everyone.
 
Last edited:
I guess I was referring to a specific strain.
Marijuana does not burn out brain cells and it is far less harmful than filtered cigarettes.

post your proof.(reputable)

for 15 years of seeing 100+people a day I can defiantly say that continued prolonged use has a lasting effect on the user. I don't believe some of the things they say ie 'gateway drug' but cognitive ability of the long time user is effected even after the user is no longer high. So if it doesn't kill brain cells, I guess it just makes you stupid.
 
That was an article about the study and a sumation in laymans terms. If you want to read the entire study, I am sure you can use the power of the internets to find it.


And I highly doubt that first time users see any drop in intelligence.
 
That was an article about the study and a sumation in laymans terms. If you want to read the entire study, I am sure you can use the power of the internets to find it.


And I highly doubt that first time users see any drop in intelligence.


If you are going to use information to back up your point it is your responsibility to bring the sources of that information not mine. Not just hearsay form some school newspaper. The power of the internet, bringing crackpot theory and conspiracy to life.

I did not say firsttime users had drops in intelligence, I said I was able to observe them from the first time use and progress from there.

The power of the internet, bringing crackpot theory and conspiracy to life.
 
Top