• The development of any software program, including, but not limited to, training a machine learning or artificial intelligence (AI) system, is prohibited using the contents and materials on this website.

Why can't I own a Canadian?

///M

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
1,064
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Nice criticism on people who try to bring religion into politics and law-making.


Why Can't I Own a Canadian?
October 2002

Dr. Laura Schlessinger is a radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a east coast resident, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them:

When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? - Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your devoted fan,
Jim
 
That's gold! :mrgreen:
 
:lol: Awesome. Hilarious.
 
That's the Mosaic law...which was replaced with only two laws when Jesus came to the earth: Love God and love your neighbor.
 
cvg said:
That's the Mosaic law...which was replaced with only two laws when Jesus came to the earth: Love God and love your neighbor.

Yeah, but the lady is a Jew. She doesn't beleive in Jesus evidently.

Though I am a religiuos person, I firmly believe that it should stay out of law-making, both ways: No laws based on it and no laws prohibiting it. There's major problems with both.
 
Almost all basic law is based off moral code: stealing, killing, lying, etc. So you can't really keep them separate.
 
Excuse me, but the "secular" society didn't come about until after the Middle Ages...so up until then all law was based off religious belief. How can there even be secular law? It doesn't make sense.
 
Just because you make a law against hurting people, or stealing thier things doesn't mean it has ties into religion. Nearly every philosophy has the same basic moral code, even ones that reject the existence of a god.
 
zenkidori said:
Great example of religion a la carte. Religious people are religious when it suits them.
Haha, damn, all day I get to quote your post and 100% agree with it. Great minds must thing alike. :p
 
zenkidori said:
Great example of religion a la carte. Religious people are religious when it suits them.

Slippery slope. :D

Oh yeah, all religions have the exact same golden rule, not to mention alot of other similar ones. You can look at this any way you like, I just think that the laws we have today are a part of the natural advancement of human thinking, and it has nothing to do with some holy inspiration.
 
///M said:
Oh yeah, all religions have the exact same golden rule, not to mention alot of other similar ones. You can look at this any way you like, I just think that the laws we have today are a part of the natural advancement of human thinking, and it has nothing to do with some holy inspiration.

Or that proves there is one and an unchanging God. It's all about perspective.
 
cvg said:
///M said:
Oh yeah, all religions have the exact same golden rule, not to mention alot of other similar ones. You can look at this any way you like, I just think that the laws we have today are a part of the natural advancement of human thinking, and it has nothing to do with some holy inspiration.

Or that proves there is one and an unchanging God. It's all about perspective.
the rules already existed before monotheist religions became known...
 
blah blah blah, can we talk about something else? The religious disscussions in this forum just keep going over the same things. I don't think anyone is really persuaded either way, so it's kind of pointless.
 
cvg said:
///M said:
Oh yeah, all religions have the exact same golden rule, not to mention alot of other similar ones. You can look at this any way you like, I just think that the laws we have today are a part of the natural advancement of human thinking, and it has nothing to do with some holy inspiration.

Or that proves there is one and an unchanging God. It's all about perspective.

Or could it be that the concept of treating all humans equally is something basic that is in all of us? If there is one, unchanging God, why does he send conflicting messages to different places? Eastern religions, even though they have the same 'golden rule', are extremely different than Abrahamic religions in terms of their world view, metaphysics, afterlife, etc.

If we want to get technical, Vedic texts predate any proven Abrahamic texts. Does that mean it proves that there are many unchanging Gods, representing one supreme Brahman?

It's pointless to keep on bringing up topics like homosexuality and back it up using the definition of marriage from the bible or what ever. Point is, religion is your own business. Don't shove your beliefs down other people's throats. Equality is a fundamental right, even if it's not guaranteed by some religions.
 
i love these types of letters and such. But i am just as interested as how the Dr. Laura Schlessinger responded to this. :lol:
 
Top