Chupacabras
Well-Known Member
I don't see the problem in riding a bike, it doesn't mean you're not a petrol head. You can still love cars and cycle; I don't know where you all get the idea that the two are mutually exclusive.
Very true
I don't see the problem in riding a bike, it doesn't mean you're not a petrol head. You can still love cars and cycle; I don't know where you all get the idea that the two are mutually exclusive.
The only good, effective and most economic way to get around in any big city is on a scooter, its perfect, small and narrow like a bicycle, fast enough, loads of space and the auto transmission is great. Twist and go baby8)
My beauty, MBK (Yamaha) Ovetto 50cc
I don't have problems with trucks or busses, since luckily I see them rarely, I do understand the issue with them not seeing you and getting under the wheels rather easily. They are still travelling in the same direction as you and the same counts for cars. However not much happens if one gets close to you, it doesnt really hurt (as long as you crash into the moving car and not the standing car at the side). A crash with a person on the other hand can hurt much more, him and you.I'm sorry, but that's nonsense. I lived in Germany for 23 years, and it was very rare that people steped on the cycle lanes while walking in their designated area. I'd rather look for pedestrians straying on my lane than trucks or busses.
Some roads in London get very narrow at rush hour because of building up traffic, and it's the busses and trucks that can't help it but end up on the cycle lane. If Ken wants Londoners to use bikes then he should invest in proper cycle lanes so that people can finally feel save while being green!
:lol:Plus guy's, it does build up the old thigh muscles, very attractive to a women - I should know I am one (a women NOT a thigh muscle)