First Drive: 2010 BMW X6 M - Bimmer builds a highrider GT-R

Aiolos

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
861
Car(s)
2005 Toyota Rav4 :-/ (Mom's)
Appears that BMW has actually made a good ///M SAV

0-60 in 4.5 sec without launch control seems ridiculously fast. Then again, this car is ridiculous.

First Drive: 2010 BMW X6 M - Bimmer builds a highrider GT-R

M aficionados take note: The 2010 X6 M (and yet-to-be-tested X5 M) represents the most dramatic shift in BMW's Motorsport division since its inception ? and it's not because they're the first crossovers branded with the tri-tone "M" badge. This high-riding duo are the first M machines ever to be equipped with all-wheel drive. The first fitted exclusively with an automatic transmission. And the first (and surely not the last) to pack a pair of turbochargers. M has evolved, but BMW hasn't lost the plot ? it's completely rewritten the screenplay, added Michael Bay firepower and harnessed the electronic might of a supercomputer farm to tie it all together.

x6m_fd000_opt.jpg


Purists have decried that "X" and "M" sharing a bootlid is the death of the brand, but these newest additions are just the latest in a long string of M-badged expansions. The brand's original intent ? producing homologation specials tailored to die-hard enthusiasts ? underwent its first conniption-inducing phase when BMW introduced the E30 M3 Convertible. Devotees cried foul, but amazingly, the brand not only survived, it thrived. Similar (if less vocal) protests were heard when the six-equipped E36 model debuted, followed by the E46 and the latest V8-powered model.

x6m_fd001_opt.jpg


While that broken record is wearing thin, there's no doubt that the M brand is completely unrecognizable two decades later. It's moved beyond motorsport to bring power, agility and engagement to the masses through BMW's bread-and-butter models. And in the case of its fire-breathing SUVs (errr... SAVs), it's a story we've seen played out by another German automaker and its controversial introduction of a high-performance 'ute. We know how well that turned out, and now we know this: the X6 M has the goods to dominate its aging competition from Stuttgart ? even if BMW doesn't want us to draw comparisons.

Packing a reworked version of the 4.4-liter twin-turbocharged V8 initially fitted to the X6 xDrive50i and later on the 2009 7 Series, the S63B44 has been tuned to deliver 555 hp at 6,000 rpm (five horsepower more than the Cayenne Turbo S ? oops, we did it again) and 501 lb-ft of twist from an oh-so-low 1,500 rpm all the way through to 5,650 rpm. The party ends at 7,000 RPM, but outputs only tell a fraction of the tale.

x6m_fd022_opt.jpg


x6m_fd014_opt.jpg


An ingenious (and patented) exhaust manifold lies between the engine's two cylinder banks, shuttling spent hydrocarbons through four individual exhaust runners, then two tuned tubes feeding a duo of twin-scroll turbos. With a compression ratio of 9.3:1, peak boost of 7.3 psi and precise pulses of exhaust gas keeping the turbos perpetually on boil, the X6 M nearly eliminates any hint of turbo lag and sets a new bar for force-fed throttle response.

This V8 is the quickest, most linear turbocharged engine we've ever tested.
BMW claims a 0 to 60 mph run of 4.5 seconds (without launch control) and we have little doubt it's more than capable of shaving a tenth or two from that figure depending on the testing method. But straight-line performance aside, this V8 is among the quickest, most linear turbocharged engines we've ever tested and the transmission delivers shifts nearly on par with the world's best dual-clutch gearboxes.

The six-speed auto 'box is a mildly reworked variant of the ZF unit found on the standard X6, and in either automatic or manual modes, the tweaked six-speed has found a soul-mate with the twin-turbo'd V8. The amount of programming that's gone into delivering seamless shifts boggles the mind, specifically the ECU's ability ? in Sport mode ? to cut ignition to one cylinder while locking the torque converter to deliver a completely imperceptible suspension of torque.

x6m_fd034_opt.jpg


x6m_fd028_opt.jpg


Although the shifts aren't nearly as impressive when the awkward but adaptable transmission stalk is set to Auto, the steering wheel-mounted paddles are laid out as God intended ? upshift on the right and downshift on the left ? and they are easily snatched for passing power on demand. To lay into the throttle in Auto mode is to take a beat and feel your kidneys wrap around your spine as all four wheels grapple the tarmac and a muted, aggressive howl erupts from the quad-tipped exhaust.

You've been waiting patiently for it: 5,324 pounds.
While the transmission is excellent and the engine is beyond reproach, the all-wheel drive system and its assorted acronyms prove BMW has signed a pact with the Devil ? one that cuts both ways and doesn't include a trip to Jenny Craig.

Originally fitted to the X6, the AWD system features BMW's torque-vectoring Dynamic Performance Control (DPC) which shuffles power between the rear wheels to maintain a constant cornering attitude no matter the conditions. It's unobtrusive and highly adaptable, accelerating the inside rear wheel when it detects oversteer, delivering more grunt to the outside rear wheel to keep understeer at bay, or sending the majority of the power to the rear wheels when nailing the long pedal in a straight line. Navigate to the vehicle settings page in the (much improved) iDrive system and passengers can see exactly which wheels are getting precisely measured delivery of torque. But it's best to avoid the desire to stare at the display, as the next corner presents itself a quickness... and you've got an unwieldy amount of mass to manhandle into submission.

x6m_fd005_opt.jpg


When the time comes to turn, the X6 M's natural tendency is towards understeer. Set to Sport, the Electronic Damping Control (EDC) and Active Roll Stabilization (ARS) do their best to mitigate the effects under load, and with a double-wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension dropped by half-an-inch and fitted with stiffer bushings, body roll is all but eliminated.

Hit the "M" button on the steering wheel, and with M Dynamic Mode (MDM) engaged, the ghosts in the machine allow for a limited amount of rear slip. Defeat the traction control completely ? as we did after a hot-lap with the head of BMW's suspension development ? and the X6 M's attitude changes ever-so-slightly, allowing for greater slip angles that won't set the fastest laps, but leave you cackling like a demented five-year-old with a gross of firecrackers.

There's a twisted appeal to piloting a crossover at triple-digits speeds then chucking it into a 90-degree left-hander.
Despite the electrowizardry adding an extra layer of anesthetic to the experience, there's a twisted appeal to be had in piloting a high-riding crossover with an elevated seating position at triple-digits speeds, only to chuck it into a 90-degree left-hander. In a weird, physics-defying way, all was right in the world ? until our fourth lap around Road Atlanta.

Heading downhill towards Turn Six, with the weight of the world (and yes, you've been waiting patiently for it, 5,324 pounds) on our shoulders, we laid into the stoppers. The pedal traveled halfway towards the floor before the X6 M began to slow. With less than 100 feet before our turn-in point, we eased off the brakes, then reapplied and forward progress was mercifully interrupted before we had the chance to test the SUV's heightened ride on an impromptu farming excursion. Turn Seven came up just as fast and the process had to be repeated. And again. And again. With its uprated 15.6-inch discs clamped by fixed, four-piston calipers in front and 15.2-inch rotors with single-piston calipers in the rear, the X6 M has the stopping power on paper to put up with this porky, high-output SUV. In torturous practice, less so. While we're not convinced the X6 M will be seeing regular track duty (particularly on a course as demanding as Road Atlanta), this is an "M" after all, and fade isn't the order du jour. We're looking forward to a full review to see if the problem persists, but somehow, we doubt it will.

x6m_fd_ab006.jpg


x6m_fd_ab007.jpg


x6m_fd_ab010.jpg


x6m_fd_ab015.jpg


Although the real M-ification of the X6 lies underneath its sheetmetal, there's little to discern the standard four-door coupe/SUV/SAV from its lesser brethren. It gets the standard gaping front grilles and fender vents, along with body-colored rocker panels and M-specific 20-inch rolling stock (fitted with 275/40 R20 front and 315/35 R20 rear run-flats) that almost appear too small in the massive body-matched wheel arches. But the overall effect is subdued, or at least as subtle as the this massive hatchback on stilts could reasonably attempt to be. It's no sleeper and it wasn't designed as such, and BMW takes pride to point out that X6 M owners are, "self-confident extroverts." No doubt...

For M addicts looking for more juice from their Roundel-badged SAVs, the X6 M is the only game in town, and at $89,725, it's likely to quell cross-shopping as it undercuts the Porsche Cayenne Turbo by a considerable margin. Add the X5 M into the equation and you've got an added dose of practicality with less divisive looks. No matter the body style, you'll be piloting one of the most formidable, meticulously engineered, tech-rich crossovers on the planet, perfected for those corrupted by power and enamored by grip ? and it's likely the last of its breed.

x6m_fd002_opt.jpg


Undoubtedly, the world's Chicken Littles will shudder at the idea of a 555-hp crossover, but the underlying technology -- forced induction, all-wheel drive and copious quantities of electronics -- that makes the X6 M such a perspective-skewing vehicle will eventually find its way into the next generation of BMWs and M products. Lightweight, fuel efficient, turbocharged offerings are right around the corner, packing enough performance to rival their modern-day counterparts while treading slightly lighter in the process. If that's the future, the X6 M is an unlikely harbinger. But we're ready for it. M is dead, long live M.
 
Last edited:
cool. now everyone in california will buy the X6M instead of the normal X6. They have the ability to drive away more quickly now so that I don't have to look at it.
 
I only need to look at that rear diffusor array and i'm nursing a semi.
 
I only need to look at that rear diffusor array and i'm nursing a semi. looking for a bucket to throw up in.

Fixed.
 
Permission to say cock. I spent the last couple of months praying next to my bed before I sleep that they wouldn't do an M version. But they have, and it's even more shit than the standard model...
 
So they took an already seriously ugly car and said: "It's too pretty damnit!!" And they made THAT!
 
I don't think anyone actually thought this would be a bad car at all: it IS a real M-car and they are not known for making a hash of things. The moment it was announced they were gonna make one it was obvious it's going to be a cracking car.

However.

It is still a 5300lbs lardass of a crossover vehicle, which in plain english means a car like that should never ever wear the sacred and distinctive M-badge, which is supposed to stand for absolute best in control, dynamics, no compromises sports vehicle. Over 5000lbs of AWD is none of those things.

Second of all I do not care how good it drives. I simply can not give a damn about how balanced it is through corners or the blistering pace it gathers. Nor do I care for the 0-60 times or the rev-happy while grunty twin-turbo engine.

Not while it looks like that. I am so sorry if that seems stupid and childish, but not in a million years will I ever buy a car so hideously ugly it makes the rotting corpse of a dead cow seem an attractive sight. That thing is a useless, fat, ill-proportioned piece of sheetmetal design gone so badly wrong even the people at Pontiac are now proud of what they did with the Aztek.

Fuck you BMW. Fuck you.
 
Last edited:
Somehow it's uglier. Quite a feat.
 

Not really, this is a different review from that.

As for the car, what it can do is quite amazing, it corners very level for a big, heavy SUV, and BMW claims it can go around the Nurburgring just as fast the latest BMW M3, but it's just way too ugly. Everytime I look of it, I think of, and I'm not joking, a retarded fat man.
 
Last edited:
Jesus Christ.
 
I just saw one of the first test drives of the BMW X6 M on a german tv-car-show, called "Grip": That car really is ridiculous! I would take an M3 or a 135i over this monstrosity all the time!
 
I'm sorry, how do you make an SUV NOT ugly by your standards?

I think its hell of a lot better than most of the other stuff in the range.
 
Alright, WHAT THE FUCK!??!??! What is it with people's obsessions with heavy as shit monstrocities??? I honestly won't drive that piece of shit if you give it to me for free. 5300lbs?? Is BMW off their fucking rocker??? And what's worse, is that these POSs will sell by the bucketload because the dumb little shits called humans will go "hey! its got a ton of power! and its a BMW! that's baller! hell yeah man!". Fuck the auto industry (with few exceptions), they are making absolute garbage nowadays. Whatever happened to the days of lightweight nimble cars? The type where you had a blast flying through corners and didn't need a huge engine because there wasn't much mass to propell.


edit: grumble... its been a long day. You should probably ignore all that ^ Suffice it to say that I don't like it that a lot of modern manufacturers think that power is a sufficient replacement for light weight.
 
Last edited:
dude, chill. I don't want small and nimble, I want big luxurious and cosseting. As do many many others.
 
IMO, this article from autocar (see below) hits the nail on the head

"BMW M (that?s for Marketing, not Motorsport)"

Greg Kable
Boarded the bomber to Atlanta, Georgia the other day to drive the BMW X6M. It?s being launched in North America because that?s where it is being built, alongside standard versions of the X6 and its mechanical identical sibling, the X5, at BMW?s ever growing Spartanburg factory in South Carolina.

Taken at face value, this is a terrifically exciting car . . . er, sorry, crossover. What with 547bhp from a twin turbocharged 4.4-litre V8 and a trick four-wheel drive system that includes an advanced planetary drive torque vectoring system, it?s every bit as rapid as the existing M5 (BMW quotes 0-62mph in 4.7sec) in a straight line.
As a round of hot laps on the Road Atlanta circuit also proved, the X6M also proved hugely competent in the handling department ? more responsive and a good deal more forgiving than either the Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG and Porsche Cayenne Turbo when you get stuck in. Given that it has 2265kg to control, the way the high riding five door liftback can be flung about is quite incredible. Its brakes are also very impressive.

Earlier, on the way to Road Atlanta, I?d marvelled at the overall refinement BMW had engineered into its latest M car. The ride, aided by masses of wheel travel, has an underlying firmness but it?s anything but harsh. At a typical 75mph highway cruise, engine noise is well isolated, aided, no doubt, by the turbochargers, which tend to dampen out mechanical influences. And despite its tall stance, wind roar doesn?t grow to irritable levels even when you push the pace up.

All good and well. But this is not an M car. At least, not in the mould of the M3, M5 or even the recently discontinued Z4 M. Okay, so the X6M manages to combine the seeming opposing qualities of an off-roader and sportscar better than any rival I?ve driven in the last 20 years. But does that in itself qualify it to wear the illustrious M badge? I think not. It's fast, no doubt. But there's a spurious lack of involvement. You also have to question whether it does enough over an above the X6 xDrive50i to warrant it being bestowed with M status.

We?ve been here before, of course. Remember when Mercedes-Benz added the R63 AMG line-up. Back then we said much the same thing ? bloody fast and hugely capable on the autobahn but hardly worthy of AMG branding. Where is it now? You won?t get Mercedes-Benz to admit it, however, it seems the R63 has quietly gone out of production due to a clear lack of buyer interest.

Will it be the same for the X6M? Time will tell, of course. One thing?s bleeding obvious though. Where the M name once stood for Motorsport, it?s now more a case of Marketing. My worry in all of this is just what damage the introduction of models like the X6M will do to the reputation and image of the M3 and M5. By attempting to broaden the reach of the M brand, BMW risks alienating the very customers that have helped make it what it is today.

X6M? Great car, wrong badge.
 
Last edited:
Top