Vette Boss
Forum Addict
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2004
- Messages
- 5,291
- Location
- United States, Britain, in time
- Car(s)
- 2006 Volkswagen Passat 3.6 VR6
You are a good man for acknowledging that fact.
Don't leave out bits of my post, in your favour.
You are a good man for acknowledging that fact.
Don't leave out bits of my post, in your favour.
I felt I had to make it correct.
You just don't know when to stop, ay. Have some class...
That is what makes the Internet fun. You got to loosen up a bit.
How do you know? All we really have is the photo above and this photo of the interior:
http://img214.imageshack.**/img214/4505/apr22008cadillaccts5bw5.jpg
Can't be sure if the interior in the photo above will be the same as the production vehicle though.
How ironic.That is what makes the Internet fun. You got to loosen up a bit.
How ironic.
Hey, I'm loose most of the time. It's just sometimes........
It looks almost exactly like the old one to me. :?
I think the whole car looks a bit tall, and I actually like the stock front better. Then again it is all in camo; I'm sure it will look absolutely evil in black.
I like how it looks. As for performance, I doubt it's going to school anyone. The current STS-V which is meant to be more sportier and powerful than the CTS-V got beaten quite easily on the track by the likes of RS4 in the last ep of best motoring.
http://isohunt.com/torrent_details/14673218/best+motoring
How is the STS-V meant to be "more sportier" than a CTS-V when it is 6 inches longer than the CTS-V and 445 lbs :shock: heavier. The only thing that the STS-V and the RS4 have in common is price.