- Joined
- Aug 26, 2005
- Messages
- 4,720
- Location
- Denver, CO
- Car(s)
- It's A HONDA! Clarity Plug In Electric
It's also assault. Which is natural. But illegal. And it ain't exactly something the passing children consent to - and if they do, they're not adult, and can't really consent to getting fecal matter thrown at them.
Comparison is invalid.
It's natural. But when you fuck my cat (he's dead, if you'd tried, you'd get beaten up), my cat has no say. He can't say yes or no.
Again, comparison is invalid.
THE COMPARISON IS INVALID BECAUSE THEY ARE ANIMALS AND I AM A HUMAN! We should endeavor to be more than our animal instincts. We think and can form relations of what would happen if you acted like an animal.
Ignoring the marriage and animal issues for the moment, your main problem is public health and the cost that diseases contracted by gays would increase health care cost/endanger public health/etc. Taking this solely into account- that your reason for disallowing something is based on health care costs and public health- then it is only logical that you would support banning, for example, cigarettes- which meet the same requirements, endangerment of public health (even discounting "secondhand-smoke") and increased healthcare costs to pay for the ailing or aging smokers. What else meets those requirements? Unhealthy food, too little exercise, visiting forgein nations (possibility of carrying virulent disease) etc. To exercise control over something because in increase health care costs and may endanger public health sounds nice but in my mind is frankly totalitarian.
I think what your referring to is my statement that I was against homosexuals. I simply want it in stated that homosexual sex can lead to personal harm. What I said is Homosexual sex has particular health concerns and issues. To have homosexuality be analogous to smoking in which their insurance rates are higher would be proper. You don't think that insurance companies exercise control (higher risk class and premium) over people who are fat ie charge them more or how they give a 'non smokers discount'. Insurance companies even ask if you have visited foreign nations a in cases wont insure or charge more. (in caveat to that its nations who are on the state departments list of bad places that insurance companies are watching for) BUT THATS NOT MY MAIN PROBLEM with gay marrage.
Understand that marriage is a legal definition that implies transference of rights and benefits. This is the major concern that cost billions in tax dollars and benefits payed.
I just want to say I am realistic in this debate. I am only saying that the marriage issue is more than just what either side wants to say; or even have the public understand.
And how about kids who fuck around without a condom? If I'm not mistaken, the Bush regime payed big money for christian organizations to tell kids they should abstain from sex, instead of using a condom, leading to most of them still having sex, but without a condom, and often in using anal cavities instead of the vaginal cavities.
First off skin to skin contact does feel better PERIOD.
That said I can't explain to you how BAD it FEELS to have to think you have an STD. Getting your bore punched as my military friends said where the nurse at my university stuck a swab down my dick. How bad it feels to walk around pacing your room thinking of the medication you will have to take for the rest of your life.