2008 Chrysler Sebring Convertible

SL65

SL65

Ambitious but rubbish!
Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Messages
9,325
Location
Sydney, Australia
Car(s)
1998 Subaru Legacy 2.5L
Chrysler unveils it's ugly convertible Sebring
http://img329.imageshack.**/img329/3888/1smallyj5.jpg
http://img329.imageshack.**/img329/8285/2smallsd0.jpg
http://img149.imageshack.**/img149/6549/3smallyp6.jpg
http://img157.imageshack.**/img157/457/4smallnr8.jpg
http://img329.imageshack.**/img329/281/5smallas0.jpg

~The boys at Chrysler like making really really long press releases for their car so I won't bother posting it. It's not like your that interested in it anyway...Basically, it comes in a "quiet" 2.4L (173hp), 2.7L V6 (189hp) and a 3.5L (235hp). It also comes standard with an analogue clock on the dash, which is thoughtfull of them~

What a revolting piece of garbage :puke:

Who in their right mind would actually WANT one of these?!! I thought the Ford Focus Convertible was fairly ugly and didn't appeal to a big market but this is just 10X worse.
 
Hideous - a badly proportioned, uncohesive pile of tripe. Must do better Chrysler.
 
I find it looks like a triangle from all the angles the back just looks huge and front is tiny, but thats not the only thing wrong with it.
 
This is coming to Australia next year. Save us all.
 
That's what we got for complaining about Chryslers cab forward design - the Stratus at least was something recogniseable as an American car.
 
This is worse than global warming.
 
Hahhhhhahahah!

This just in: "5-Series humps Crossfire, illegitimate offspring drops top for press"
 
This is seriously the worst new car ever...at least they got rid of the fussy pillarage of the sedan, but that's like saying tuberculosis isn't that bad of a disease because "tuberculosis" is a cool word. I swear, the people at Chrysler must have gone out of their way to screw up the Sebring that badly, and the convertible is just as bad.

The worst part is that it's going to be sold in England. With a straight face. Ho boy, that's not embarrassing or anything. Dodge Caliber, Jeep Compass (presumably), Dodge Nitro (ditto), and this. Yee haw, bitches. I hope Jeremy Clarkson sets one on fire.

cvg said:
Michael Scott would love it!
Click to expand...
:lol: Suits his personality perfectly!
 
Like an old woman, this car needs to keep its top on.

Unfortunately I forsee this car being driven by middle-aged "independant" desperate housewives type of women.
 
It looks like a boat. What the hell were they thinking? Look how narrow the rear 'window/roof' bit is where it meets the body at the back.

That thing is all kinds of wrong.
 
3.5L and 235 horsepower? That must be some kind of record... worst power to litreage ratio?

But I can see why people would buy it... it's probably one of the cheapest convertibles you can buy. It's not as ugly as that ugly as sin PT Cruiser.
 
Yes, he would... and you, sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.

Umm, yeah, that was a woman... really low voice.

cvg said:
Michael Scott would love it!
Click to expand...
 
Oh, like this is anything new for Chrysler. PT Cruiser Convert, anyone?

Still, this car, like all ugly cars, seems to have a diehard following. Tons of convertible Sebring drivers out there, who want big, soft, mushy cars with a lot of room
 
What is really sad is that it is called Sebring. A name that deserves a great looking and performing car. A BIG Dissappointment - C'mon MB get you act together and help Chrysler make a Good/Great car called Sebring.
 
The only thing Chrysler have done rigth is the crossfire, but that is a Merc SLK in disguise... And the Merc is better looking. Exept it's a very girlie car. Still the Crossfire is pretty cheap, but you get wath you pay for... You get a rearwheel drive car with to seats etc... Not a very bad car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top