Sir Stiggington
Well-Known Member
It was the wrong decision. Lewis would have given the championship to Raikkonen anyway. This just shows how unfair the FIA is.
I dont think anyone really expected McLaren to win. It seems to me to be an impossible decision but the only one to take if Raikkonen was to remain champion, which I think is probably the dominant factor in the decisions of the court.
It was the wrong decision. Lewis would have given the championship to Raikkonen anyway. This just shows how unfair the FIA is.
Why don't you consider the fact, that extra 5 degrees in fuel temperature doesn't really give any advantage?
Williams BMW fuel error confirmed
Following a thorough investigation, we can today reveal the result of the Williams and BMW fuel scandal.
Malmesbury Motors have confirmed that Mrs Helen Williams, a housewife from Swindon, recently filled her BMW with diesel instead of unleaded, landing her with a huge repair bill.
Said garage owner, Craig Stinchcombe, ?This happens a lot, people are forever putting the wrong type of fuel into a car and it?s left to us to help them out?.
The result of the inquiry is not expected to affect the result of the F1 World Championship, though Mr Williams is said to be rather unhappy.
Why don't you consider the fact, that extra 5 degrees in fuel temperature doesn't really give any advantage?
Is that a fact? Well, if 5 degrees isn't an advantage, then neither is 10 or 15 or 30. Correct? Zero times 10 is still nothing, right?
I don't care about who's wrong & who's right, Ferrari won both champs, which i wouldn't have considered a possibility a year ago after Michael announced his retirement.
There's no proof, that 5 degrees extra fuel temeprature is a speed/performance advantage, it doesn't matter if there's at 15 or 20 degrees extra, because they overstepped the limit by 4-5.
Since there's no evidence/proof of possible gained advantage -> there's no advantage -> Failed Appeal. That's how the law works, you killed a man, but there was no evidence found, so, legaly, you're not guilty.
Why don't you consider the fact, that extra 5 degrees in fuel temperature doesn't really give any advantage?
kekekeke said:McLaren were found guilty of possessing Ferrari IP, but they weren't found guilty of using them for advantage. Yet they still got a harsh penalty.
The FOM temperature readings were pretty obviously wildly inaccurate. Just think about the track temperature they gave, which was in the vicinity of 60 degrees Celsius; not even in ultra-hot desert tracks like Bahrain the temperature hasn't soared over 60. That's where the doubt over the temperature came: the teams' weather men gave temperatures which would place the fuel in the tanks in the legal limit.