racingfan1
Well-Known Member
Good work Johnson, keep it up!
Uh, sir, he's Johnson, I'm not.
Good work Johnson, keep it up!
They have to use refridgerated coffee in an iced coffee or other cold drinks. If you poured hot coffee into a cup of ice, you'd get a cup of watered-down room-temperature coffee.
We have Starbucks on base here and it's the usual barely-fit-for-human-consumption crap you get all over the states. But go to a local Japanese Starbucks and...oh...my...wow! I took a drink and I jizzed in my pants. It's seriously some of the best coffee I've ever had and I'm not easily impressed with my brews. I think it's because the Japanese actually take pride in their work instead of just throwing together the ingredients according to the instructions.
They over roast their beans. It's the easy way to get consistent flavor out of the beans. More attentive and well trained staff could easily roast the beans correctly. But your average commercial-coffee-place barista doesn't really care about coffee.
I don't have much experience with Port Maquarie, but it is a fairly nice place, albeit slightly boring. How long are they going to be there for?A friend of mine is moving to Port Macquarie, NSW...any opinions on the place from our resident Aussies?
Yep, it did that here about 10 minutes before you posted that . Great thing was, I was outdoors with no source of cover at the time. Got completely soaked before crossing a street 4cm deep in water and taking refuge in a shop.Holy sheep, it just started bucketing down in epic proportions here!!!!
It is HIS face, HIS privacy. He has rights, you know? Maybe he is acting childish, maybe you don't agree with his reasons, but he is entitled to his privacy. This has nothing to do with it being your camera, your party or anything. If he wants the photo he's in taken down, you have to oblige...One of my friends on Facebook is having a whinge about some photos from an event I posted a year ago.
[...]
This has caused the pics to pop up on her page, so her brother sent an email demanding I remove the pictures as they are now "unnecessary" (there are 2 pictures where his now ex-girlfriend appears).
Am I wrong in feeling it's rude of him to demand I delete them "or else"?
It's MY page, they're MY photos, at an event that was held for me and the other girls that were heading off OS for a holiday together.
...but most of all, THIS.This is why facebook is ridiculous. It over complicates simple things. Like friendship, for example.
This is why facebook is ridiculous. It over complicates simple things. Like friendship, for example.
Assuming you're on windows go to Control Panel --> System --> Hardware --> Hardware-Manager (Device Manager? Whatever), find your pointing device, click on "update drivers" and manually point the compter to wherever you unzipped the new touchpad drivers.Hmm. Suddenly the touch-pad on my laptop is even more borked than it used to be. It used to randomly just quit working sometimes, making me either have to restart or plug in a USB mouse to have a working mouse again. I tried updating the drivers last night and now they've all just disappeared. The touch-pad still works, but it is less functional than before - it used to have scroll capabilities. Now all it does is move the mouse and tap-to-click. Buggery, now I have to go find the correct drivers again and try to fix it. Not having my scrolling touch-pad drives me absolutely bonkers.
Assuming you're on windows go to Control Panel --> System --> Hardware --> Hardware-Manager (Device Manager? Whatever), find your pointing device, click on "update drivers" and manually point the compter to wherever you unzipped the new touchpad drivers.
I don't have to oblige him anything. They're not going anywhere. He can carry on like the little girl he is, or grow the hell up and get over it.It is HIS face, HIS privacy. He has rights, you know? Maybe he is acting childish, maybe you don't agree with his reasons, but he is entitled to his privacy. This has nothing to do with it being your camera, your party or anything. If he wants the photo he's in taken down, you have to oblige...
...but most of all, THIS.
I don't have to oblige him anything. They're not going anywhere. He can carry on like the little girl he is, or grow the hell up and get over it.
By tomorrow they'll have disappeared off his sister's page, and he'll forget they exist, just like he has for the last 12 months.
As the photographer, I have copyright of the photos, and am entitled to publish/distribute them as I see fit. He consented to this by allowing himself to be photographed.
I don't have to oblige him anything. They're not going anywhere. He can carry on like the little girl he is, or grow the hell up and get over it.
By tomorrow they'll have disappeared off his sister's page, and he'll forget they exist, just like he has for the last 12 months.
As the photographer, I have copyright of the photos, and am entitled to publish/distribute them as I see fit. He consented to this by allowing himself to be photographed.
I don't have to oblige him anything. They're not going anywhere. He can carry on like the little girl he is, or grow the hell up and get over it.
By tomorrow they'll have disappeared off his sister's page, and he'll forget they exist, just like he has for the last 12 months.
As the photographer, I have copyright of the photos, and am entitled to publish/distribute them as I see fit. He consented to this by allowing himself to be photographed.
At least here photographing anyone in public and publishing is allowed without permission if it doesn't invade their privacy. Public places are everything anyone can have access, even night clubs or bars if it's not a private event, so it really depends what sort of context and pictures we are talking about. Usually it's not ok to publish someone if they tell you not to.
This is how it's over here, crazy Australia might of course be crazy.
edit. Well that clears it up then.
If he is complaining about other people's images being used (i.e. photos of them being posted by you), then yes, you have every right to keep them up as long as you have thier permission. However, the subject of the photo (under Australian law) still has right over the use of their image, including permission to both allow and revoke the right to publish it. So if this guy is kicking up a stink over a photo he is in, by law you have to take it down. If he was to kcomplain to any authority (most likely Facebook), they would side with him.
See, that's not how it works. At least in the EU (and judging from the above, in Australia, too), someone who has a substatial part in creating a piece of work (in this case, by being in a photo), has to waive his rights in writing.misrabelle said:As the photographer, I have copyright of the photos, and am entitled to publish/distribute them as I see fit. He consented to this by allowing himself to be photographed.
How can I convince my Dad that our computer downstairs (a 5 year old cheap branded PC bought from Target) just can't handle the internet because it's too good for the computer? He still believes that there is a problem with the settings and yes, there may be a problem, but I just wished that he admitted defeat and started saving for a new one.