NAIDANAC A
Well-Known Member
The back seats are useless.
[pedantic german]Nein!; If you're thinking of the 997 Turbo then it's .2 of a second faster than the manual and .1 of a second slower than the Tiptronic S...[/pedantic german]Figures are good though. That's .4 seconds quicker to 60 than a 911 turbo. That'll do thanks.
[pedantic german]Nein!; If you're thinking of the 997 Turbo then it's .2 of a second faster than the manual and .1 of a second slower than the Tiptronic S...[/pedantic german]
I don't know if it's the 997, I can't tell one 911 generation from the other I went from what is on the Porsche UK site http://www.porsche.com/uk/ Models > 911 Overview > 911 Turbo. That quotes 3.9 and is the lowest of any of the 911's mentioned there. But I stand to be corrected.
One word: Ugly
so hot... now i have to go buy motor trend
That's because the UK lists the acelleration to 62 mph (same as 100 km/h, well to be very pedantic 100 km/h is 62,1504 mph, but anyway...) and not 60 mph as in the US. The slight difference is due to getting to 62 mph usually requires a gear change. Motor Trend is an american magazine so they use 60 mph and not 62 mph.I don't know if it's the 997, I can't tell one 911 generation from the other I went from what is on the Porsche UK site http://www.porsche.com/uk/ Models > 911 Overview > 911 Turbo. That quotes 3.9 and is the lowest of any of the 911's mentioned there. But I stand to be corrected.
That is the only decent looking thing on/in the car.
That is the only decent looking thing on/in the car.