nsx_23
Forum Addict
- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 7,709
Lets be fair here the RS6 was heavily rengineered by Audi from a performance standpoint it it quite a bit different than the A6 or even the S6. By your argument hardly any cars are performance oriented including every thing from the history of Mpower road cars (except the M1) every GTR except the latest variant, every Mazdaspeed car (except the MX-5) never mind all of the Type Rs (except NSX) innumerable RS badged Fords and pretty much every muscle car in the history of muscle cars from both America and Austrailia. Calling the RS6 not performance focused is just stupid it is one of the most performance focused Audis you can buy that isn't a R8.
I have no problem with the badge It's the huge ass wheels and slammed to fuck stance that i find stupid on this particular car. Look everyone is entitled to their opinion especially on the INTERNET i was just trying explain why i find a dumped RS6 on 20s ugly as shit but still love that truck or a LS400 that has been bagged and dropped to the ground rolling on 21" Works that weight 35lb each.
So earlier I mentioned that I was in the market for a porsche. I was originally looking at the base Carrera and then decided on the Carrera S coupe. Now i'm debating whether it's worth going for a cabriolet (And paying maybe 7k or more) or going for a GTS coupe (and paying maybe 10k more). The sensible option would be to stick with the Carrera S. I'm pulling out my hair weighing options. I'm going to speak with dealer to see what's out there, of course ordering is still an option too.
I would personally stick with a hard top model with a proper manual trans. The cabriolet models tend to be garage queens and have worse depreciation. BUT, you should buy whatever you enjoy the most.
I would personally stick with a hard top model with a proper manual trans. The cabriolet models tend to be garage queens and have worse depreciation. BUT, you should buy whatever you enjoy the most.
This. Don't get a cabriolet, the weight and loss of structural rigidity ruins the dynamics. Don't waste your time fretting over the GTS model, just go with you heart and get a C2S 6 speed manual
If you must have a convertible, man up and get the Spyder, who cares about the top and how fiddly it is? Leave it at home and drive 80 through the rain.
Will it be the PDK transmission? If so, I would go for it. It's an impressive piece of kit.
True, I've riden in a 997 Turbo with PDK and it shifts very quickly indeed. But, Porsche manuals are among the best out there. Try one before you commit to the PDK, as they are a very rewarding gearbox to use and you save thousands (it was something like a $10,000 option or something ridiculous on the 997)
I said serious performance orientated car.
The Audi is a front heavy (with the engine way out over the front axle) and overall heavy. It's a luxury/family car modified to go fast. At least when BMW built the M-cars they started with a good chassis design and made it better. Perfect example, they took an e30 and stuck a shorter/lighter engine in the car to keep the weight as centered in the chassis as possible.
Type-R's are FWD. The Aussie and American muscle cars are only good for straight line speed anyway, and probably why most people don't really give a damn about them being so low... or like them when they are dropped.
The RS6 comes factory with 19's and optionally 20" wheels. And BTW, those are AMG wheels, aren't AMG supposed to be up there with the RS/M cars as well? You going to hate on stock AMG's now?
Hmmm I saw the Mugen Ariel Atom earlier on this morning. Not quite sure if I've made me mind up about it to be honest. All I know is that if I sat in it me arse would get pretty cold quick-smart.
Jamiroquai
Will it be the PDK transmission? If so, I would go for it. It's an impressive piece of kit.
And yet the Type-Rs are still performance oriented/focused same with other FWD hot hatches like the VW Golf GTi, Various Peugeot GTi/T16s through the years and pretty much anything that comes out of Renaultsport.