And yet, a large portion of the yearly budget for these reservations comes from those hunters. So by killing a few animals a year, they pay for the protection of a lot more. Doesn't make these hunters any less sad, just to make the moral discussion a bit less black-and-white.
Hunters are quite often the most ardent environmentalists.[...]
have them shoot tranquilizer darts.
they'll have hunted! and the animal will live another day...
(granted it isn't being eaten while asleep :lol
Can't we just start hunting vegans instead? Animals win, we win, everyone wins!
Wait until you get into a conversation with a violent racist who talks about hunting chimpanzees. Yeah. Fer serious.
Can't we just start hunting vegans instead? Animals win, we win, everyone wins!
One of the first laws the Nazis brought on the way in 1993, was the "Reichstierschutzgesetz" and vegetarianism was very popular among the Nazi leaders
Oh really ?
Mahatma Ghandi once said that you can tell how mature a country is by the way it treats animals.
I bet he didn't know that in the case of animal protection no country was as progressive as Nazi-Germany No, really, it's true: One of the first laws the Nazis brought on the way in 1933, was the "Reichstierschutzgesetz" and vegetarianism was very popular among the Nazi leaders
I know it's unfair and highly provocative but it's also always quite funny to confront vegetarians or vegans or animal rights activists with those simple facts, when they try to missionize you. They probably won't like you anymore but hey, you shut them up and that means mission accomplished
And if that isn't enough, also mention that soybean monocultures destroy animal living space
....Flying to Africa to shoot a lion, however, is not hunting. It's not honorable. On the contrary: That whole "man vs. beast" jabbering is bullshit, coming from cowards. Because they always kill from a safe distance and even if they use a crossbow, there are at least two people with a rifle standing right next to him - just in case.
And yet, a large portion of the yearly budget for these reservations comes from those hunters. So by killing a few animals a year, they pay for the protection of a lot more. Doesn't make these hunters any less sad, just to make the moral discussion a bit less black-and-white.
I'm all for letting people do whatever they want to do, not against hunting, eat a lot of meat, none of that, but the idea of a wealthy westener flying around the world to Africa to go shoot a big cat, I dunno, it does not sit right..